首页> 外文期刊>BJOG: an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology >A systematic review on reported outcomes and outcome measures in female idiopathic chronic pelvic pain for the development of a core outcome set
【24h】

A systematic review on reported outcomes and outcome measures in female idiopathic chronic pelvic pain for the development of a core outcome set

机译:关于核心成果开发核对慢性骨盆疼痛的报告结果和结果措施的系统综述

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background A core outcome set (COS) is required to address inconsistencies in outcome reporting in chronic pelvic pain (CPP) trials. Objectives Evaluation of reported outcomes and selected outcome measures in CPP trials by producing a comprehensive inventory to inform a COS. Search strategy Systematic review of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) identified from Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Embase and MEDLINE databases. Selection criteria RCTs assessing efficacy and safety of medical, surgical and psychological interventions for women with idiopathic CPP. Data collection and analysis Two independent researchers extracted outcomes and outcome measures. Similar outcomes were grouped and classified into domains to produce a structured inventory. Main results Twenty-four trials were identified including 136 reported outcomes and outcome measures. Rates of reporting outcomes varied (4-100%) and pelvic pain was the most frequently reported outcome (100%). All trials reported the pain domain; however, only half reported quality of life, clinical effectiveness and adverse events. No differences in outcome reporting were observed in five high-quality trials (21%). Univariate analysis demonstrated an association between quality of outcome reporting and methodological quality of studies (r(s) = 0.407,P = 0.048). Conclusion There is wide variation in reported outcomes and applied outcome measures in CPP trials. While a COS is being developed and implemented, we propose the interim use of commonly reported outcomes in each domain: pain (pelvic pain, dyspareunia, dysmenorrhoea), life impact (quality of life, emotional functioning, physical functioning), clinical effectiveness (efficacy, satisfaction, cost effectiveness, return to daily activities) and adverse events (surgical, perioperative observations, nonsurgical). Tweetable abstract There is significant variation in outcome reporting in CPP trials. Our systematic review forms the basis for the development of a core outcome set.
机译:背景技术需要核心结果组(COS)来解决慢性盆腔疼痛(CPP)试验中的结果报告中的不一致。目的通过制定全面库存来评估报告的成果和选定的结果措施,通过制作全面的库存来通知A COS。搜索战略系统审查由Cochrane中央登记册(中央),EMBASE和MEDLINE数据库中鉴定的随机对照试验(RCT)的系统审查。选择标准RCTS评估具有特发性CPP的妇女医疗,手术和心理干预的疗效和安全性。数据收集与分析两位独立研究人员提取了结果和结果措施。将类似的结果分组并分为域以产生结构化库存。主要结果确定了二十四项试验,其中包括136个报告的结果和结果措施。报告结果不同(4-100%)和骨盆疼痛是最常见的报告结果(100%)。所有试验报告疼痛领域;但是,只有一半的报告生活质量,临床效果和不良事件。在五项高质量试验中没有观察到结果报告的差异(21%)。单变量分析表明了结果报告和方法的方法质量之间的关联(R(s)= 0.407,p = 0.048)。结论报告的结果和CPP试验中的应用成果措施各有广泛。在开发和实施中的COS时,我们提出了临时使用常见域的结果:疼痛(盆腔疼痛,呼吸困难,疑难奈,痛经),生命影响(生活质量,情绪运作,身体发作),临床效果(疗效,满意度,成本效益,恢复日常活动)和不良事件(外科,围手术期观察,非诊断)。 Twelable摘要在CPP试验中有显着的成果报告变化。我们的系统评价构成了核心成果集的发展的基础。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号