首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>BMC Medical Research Methodology >Harmonization of delirium severity instruments: a comparison of the DRS-R-98 MDAS and CAM-S using item response theory

【2h】

Harmonization of delirium severity instruments: a comparison of the DRS-R-98 MDAS and CAM-S using item response theory

机译：ir妄严重程度仪器的协调：使用项目响应理论比较DRS-R-98MDAS和CAM-S

代理获取

本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务，本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文，但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁，仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况，如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

页面导航

摘要
著录项
相似文献
相关主题

摘要

BackgroundThis study aimed to describe the level of agreement of three commonly used delirium instruments: the Delirium Rating Scale-Revised-98 (DRS-R-98), Memorial Delirium Assessment Scale (MDAS), and Confusion Assessment Method-Severity (CAM-S).

机译：背景本研究旨在描述三种常用的ir妄仪器的一致程度：Deli妄评定量表修订版98（DRS-R-98），纪念性r妄评估量表（MDAS）和混淆评估方法严重性（CAM-S））。

著录项

期刊名称 BMC Medical Research Methodology
作者
Alden L. Gross; Doug Tommet; Madeline D’Aquila; Eva Schmitt; Edward R. Marcantonio; Benjamin Helfand; Sharon K. Inouye; Richard N. Jones; Sharon K. Inouye; Richard N. Jones; Tamara Fong; Tammy Hshieh; Edward R. Marcantonio; Annie Racine; Eva M. Schmitt; Dena Schulman-Green; Patricia A. Tabloski; Thomas Travison; Tatiana Abrantes; Brett Armstrong; Sylvia Bertrand; Angelee Butters; Madeline D’Aquila; Jacqueline Gallagher; Jennifer Kettell; Jacqueline Nee; Katelyn Parisi; Margaret Vella; Guoquan Xu; Lauren Weiner; Yun Gou; Douglas Tommet; Charles H. Brown; Sevdenur Cizginer; Diane Clark; Joseph H. Flaherty; Anne Gleason; Ann M. Kolanowski; Karen J. Neufeld; Margaret G. O’Connor; Margaret A. Pisani; Thomas Robinson; Joe Verghese; Heidi Wald; Sharon M. Gordon;
展开▼
作者单位

展开▼
年(卷),期 2018(18),-1
年度 2018
页码 92
总页数 18
原文格式 PDF
正文语种
中图分类医院、综合医院;中医院;
关键词
Delirium Severity Elderly Psychometrics Item response theory;

机译：妄想症;严重程度;老年人;心理计量学;项目反应理论;

相似文献

外文文献
中文文献
专利

1. Harmonization of delirium severity instruments: a comparison of the DRS-R-98, MDAS, and CAM-S using item response theory [J] . Alden L. Gross, Doug Tommet, Madeline D’Aquila, BMC Medical Research Methodology . 2018,第1期

机译：ir妄严重度仪器的协调：使用项目响应理论比较DRS-R-98，MDAS和CAM-S
2. Comparison of Single-Response Format and Forced-Choice Format Instruments Using Thurstonian Item Response Theory [J] . Dueber David M., Love Abigail M. A., Toland Michael D., Educational and Psychological Measurement . 2019,第1期

机译：使用Thurstonian项目响应理论的单响应格式和强制选择格式仪器的比较
3. Comparisons Across Depression Assessment Instruments in Adolescence and Young Adulthood: An Item Response Theory Study Using Two Linking Methods [J] . Thomas M. Olino, Lan Yu, Dana L. McMakin, Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology . 2013,第8期

机译：青春期和成年期抑郁评估工具的比较：一项使用两种关联方法的项目反应理论研究
4. Applying Item Response Theory to Evaluate Instruments of Introductory Programming Skills Measurement [C] . Jucelio S. Santos, Wilkerson L. Andrade, João Brunet, IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference . 2020

机译：应用项目响应理论评估介绍编程技巧测量的仪器
5. An empirical comparison of item response theory and classical test theory item/person statistics. [D] . Courville, Troy Gerard. 2004

机译：项目响应理论与经典测试理论项目/人员统计数据的经验比较。
6. Comparison of Single-Response Format and Forced-Choice Format Instruments Using Thurstonian Item Response Theory [O] . David M. Dueber, Abigail M. A. Love, Michael D. Toland, 2019

机译：使用瑟斯顿项目响应理论比较单响应格式和强制选择格式的仪器
7. Harmonization of delirium severity instruments: a comparison of the DRS-R-98, MDAS, and CAM-S using item response theory [O] . Alden L. Gross, Doug Tommet, Madeline D’Aquila, 2018

机译：协调谵妄严重性仪器：使用物品响应理论的DRS-R-98，MDA和CAM-S比较
8. Scoring Methods and Measurement Properties of Health Status Measures: AnEmpirical Comparison of Summative and Item Response Theory Scoring for the SF-36 Physical Functioning Scale. Abstract and Executive Summary of Dissertation [R] . Chan, K. S. 2000

机译：健康状况测量的评分方法和测量特性：sF-36物理功能量表的总结和项目反应理论评分的实证比较。论文摘要与执行摘要

Harmonization of delirium severity instruments: a comparison of the DRS-R-98 MDAS and CAM-S using item response theory

摘要

著录项

相似文献

相关主题

期刊订阅