首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders >Cemented compared to uncemented femoral stems in total hip replacement for displaced femoral neck fractures in the elderly: study protocol for a single-blinded randomized controlled trial (CHANCE-trial)
【2h】

Cemented compared to uncemented femoral stems in total hip replacement for displaced femoral neck fractures in the elderly: study protocol for a single-blinded randomized controlled trial (CHANCE-trial)

机译:老年人股骨颈置换术中全髋置换术中骨水泥桩与非骨水泥股骨柄的比较:一项单盲随机对照试验(CHANCE-试验)的研究方案

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

BackgroundTotal hip replacement (THR) is the preferred method for the active and lucid elderly patient with a displaced femoral neck fracture (FNF). But controversy still exists regarding using cemented or uncemented stem in these patients. The aim of this study is to compare a cemented and uncemented femoral stem in patients 65–79 years treated surgically with THR for displaced FNF.
机译:背景全髋关节置换术(THR)是活跃而清醒的老年患者股骨颈骨折(FNF)的首选方法。但是,在这些患者中使用骨水泥或非骨水泥的茎仍然存在争议。这项研究的目的是比较经THR置换FNF手术治疗的65-79岁患者股骨柄的骨水泥和非骨水泥。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号