首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>BMJ Open >How often are interventions in cluster-randomised controlled trials of complex interventions in general practices effective and reasons for potential shortcomings? Protocol and results of a feasibility project for a systematic review
【2h】

How often are interventions in cluster-randomised controlled trials of complex interventions in general practices effective and reasons for potential shortcomings? Protocol and results of a feasibility project for a systematic review

机译:在一般实践中对复杂干预措施进行整群随机对照试验的干预措施有效的频率和潜在缺陷的原因?进行系统审查的可行性项目的协议和结果

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

IntroductionMost studies conducted at general practices investigate complex interventions and increasingly use cluster-randomised controlled trail (c-RCT) designs to do so. Our primary objective is to evaluate how frequently complex interventions are shown to be more, equally or less effective than routine care in c-RCTs with a superior design. The secondary aim is to discover whether the quality of a c-RCT determines the likelihood of the complex intervention being effective.
机译:简介大多数在常规实践中进行的研究都对复杂的干预措施进行了调查,并越来越多地使用集群随机控制的跟踪(c-RCT)设计来实现这一目标。我们的主要目标是评估在设计精良的c-RCT中,复杂干预措施比常规护理更有效,相等或更少的频率。第二个目的是发现c-RCT的质量是否确定复杂干预有效的可能性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号