首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>The Journal of Physiology >Age-dependent variations in the directional sensitivity of balance corrections and compensatory arm movements in man
【2h】

Age-dependent variations in the directional sensitivity of balance corrections and compensatory arm movements in man

机译:年龄相关的平衡校正和人体手臂补偿运动的方向敏感性变化

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

We investigated the effects of ageing on balance corrections induced by sudden stance perturbations in different directions. Effects were examined in biomechanical and electromyographic (EMG) recordings from a total of 36 healthy subjects divided equally into three age groups (20–34, 35–55 and 60–75 years old). Perturbations consisted of six combinations of support-surface roll (laterally) and pitch (forward-backward) each with 7.5 deg amplitude (2 pure pitch, and 4 roll and pitch) delivered randomly. To reduce stimulus predictability further and to investigate scaling effects, perturbations were at either 30 or 60 deg s−1. In the legs, trunk and arms we observed age-related changes in balance corrections. The changes that appeared in the lower leg responses included smaller stretch reflexes in soleus and larger reflexes in tibialis anterior of the elderly compared with the young. For all perturbation directions, onsets of balance correcting responses in these ankle muscles were delayed by 20–30 ms and initially had smaller amplitudes (between 120–220 ms) in the elderly. This reduced early activity was compensated by increased lower leg activity after 240 ms. These EMG changes were paralleled by comparable differences in ankle torque responses, which were initially (after 160 ms) smaller in the elderly, but subsequently greater (after 280 ms). Findings in the middle-aged group were generally intermediate between the young and the elderly groups. Comparable results were obtained for the two different stimulus velocities. Stimulus-induced trunk roll, but not trunk pitch, changed dramatically with increasing age. Young subjects responded with early large roll movements of the trunk in the opposite direction to platform roll. A similarly directed but reduced amplitude of trunk roll was observed in the middle-aged. The elderly had very little initial roll modulation and also had smaller stretch reflexes in paraspinals. Balance-correcting responses (over 120–220 ms) in gluteus medius and paraspinals were equally well tuned to roll in the elderly, as in the young, but were reduced in amplitude. Onset latencies were delayed with age in gluteus medius muscles. Following the onset of trunk and hip balance corrections, trunk roll was in the same direction as support-surface motion for all age groups and resulted in overall trunk roll towards the fall side in the elderly, but not in the young. Protective arm movements also changed with age. Initial arm roll movements were largest in the young, smaller in the middle aged, and smallest in the elderly. Initial arm roll movements were in the same direction as initial trunk motion in the young and middle aged. Thus initial roll arm movements in the elderly were directed oppositely to those in the young. Initial pitch motion of the arms was similar across age groups. Subsequent arm movements were related to the amplitude of deltoid muscle responses which commenced at 100 ms in the young and 20–30 ms later in the elderly. These deltoid muscle responses preceded additional arm roll motion which left the arms directed ‘downhill’ (in the direction of the fall) in the elderly, but ‘uphill’ (to counterbalance motion of the pelvis) in the young. We conclude that increased trunk roll stiffness is a key biomechanical change with age. This interferes with early compensatory trunk movements and leads to trunk displacements in the direction of the impending fall. The reversal of protective arm movements in the elderly may reflect an adaptive strategy to cushion the fall. The uniform delay and amplitude reduction of balance-correcting responses across many segments (legs, hips and arms) suggests a neurally based alteration in processing times and response modulation with age. Interestingly, the elderly compensated for these ‘early abnormalities’ with enlarged later responses in the legs, but no similar adaptation was noted in the arms and trunk. These changes with age provide an insight into possible mechanisms underlying falls in the elderly.
机译:我们研究了老化对不同方向上突然的姿态扰动引起的平衡校正的影响。在总共36位健康受试者的生物力学和肌电图(EMG)记录中检查了效果,将其平均分为三个年龄段(20-34、35-55和60-75岁)。扰动由支撑表面侧倾(横向)和俯仰(前后)的六个组合组成,每个组合的7.5度振幅(2个纯俯仰,4个横滚和俯仰)随机传递。为了进一步降低刺激的可预测性并研究缩放效应,摄动发生在30度或60度s -1 上。在腿部,躯干和手臂中,我们观察到了与年龄相关的平衡校正变化。与年轻人相比,老年人的小腿反应出现的变化包括比目鱼的比目鱼肌拉伸反射较小和胫骨前部反射较大。对于所有扰动方向,老年人脚踝肌肉中平衡校正反应的发作延迟了20–30 ms,最初振幅较小(在120–220 ms之间)。这种减少的早期活动被240毫秒后小腿活动增加所补偿。这些肌电图的变化与踝部扭矩响应的可比差异相平行,踝部扭矩响应在老年人中最初(160毫秒后)较小,但随后较大(280毫秒后)。中年组的发现通常介于年轻人和老年人之间。对于两种不同的刺激速度,获得了可比的结果。随着年龄的增长,刺激引起的躯干侧倾,但躯干俯仰没有改变。年轻的受试者以与平台侧倾相反的方向,进行了躯干的早期大侧倾运动。在中年人中观察到了类似的定向但躯干侧倾幅度减小。老年人的初始侧倾调节很小,而脊椎旁的牵拉反射较小。臀小肌和脊椎旁的平衡校正响应(超过120-220 ms)在老年人中与年轻人一样,均经过适当调整以使其滚动,但幅度减小了。臀中肌肌肉的发病潜伏期随着年龄的增长而延迟。在开始躯干和髋部平衡矫正后,所有年龄组的躯干侧倾与支撑表面运动的方向相同,导致老年人的躯干侧倾总体朝着跌倒一侧,而年轻人则不然。保护性手臂的动作也随着年龄而变化。初次手臂滚动运动在年轻人中最大,在中年人中较小,而在老年人中最小。初始侧倾运动与年轻人和中年人初始躯干运动的方向相同。因此,老年人的初始侧倾臂运动与年轻人相反。手臂的初始俯仰运动在各个年龄段都相似。随后的手臂运动与三角肌反应的幅度有关,后者在年轻人中开始于100 ms,在老年人中开始于20–30 ms。这些三角肌反应是在手臂进行额外的侧倾运动之前发生的,这使老年人的手臂处于“下坡”(跌落方向),而年轻人则处于“上坡”(平衡骨盆运动)。我们得出结论,增加躯干侧倾刚度是随年龄增长的关键生物力学变化。这会干扰躯干的早期补偿性运动,并导致躯干向即将坠落的方向移位。老年人保护性手臂运动的逆转可能反映了一种缓冲跌倒的自适应策略。跨多个部分(腿,臀部和手臂)的平衡校正响应的均匀延迟和幅度减小表明处理时间和响应调制随年龄的变化是基于神经的。有趣的是,老年人通过扩大后腿的反应来弥补这些“早期异常”,但在手臂和躯干上没有发现类似的适应。这些随着年龄的变化,可以洞悉老年人跌倒的可能机制。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号