首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>The British Journal of General Practice >Whats the best buy for treatment of constipation? Results of a systematic review of the efficacy and comparative efficacy of laxatives in the elderly.
【2h】

Whats the best buy for treatment of constipation? Results of a systematic review of the efficacy and comparative efficacy of laxatives in the elderly.

机译:治疗便秘的最佳选择是什么?对老年人使用泻药的疗效和比较疗效的系统评价的结果。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Constipation is a common cause of general practice consultations in elderly people, and laxative use is common among this group of patients. However, there appears to be little evidence to guide laxative treatment in this population. This paper reports the results of a systematic review of randomized controlled trials of the efficacy of laxatives in the treatment of constipation in the elderly. While the results of the review suggest that laxatives can improve bowel movement frequency, stool consistency, and symptoms of constipation, with a few exceptions, the relevant trials have serious methodological shortcomings. However, the review finds little evidence of marked differences in effectiveness between laxatives and, in particular, there appears to be no evidence to support the current National Health Service (NHS) trend towards prescribing the more expensive stimulant laxatives. This is an area where good quality trial evidence is now needed.
机译:便秘是老年人进行普通科诊治的常见原因,在这类患者中,通便使用是很常见的。但是,似乎很少有证据可以指导该人群的通便治疗。本文报道了泻药治疗老年人便秘疗效的随机对照试验的系统评价结果。审查的结果表明,泻药可以改善排便频率,大便稠度和便秘症状,除少数例外,相关试验在方法学上存在严重缺陷。但是,该评论几乎没有证据表明泻药之间的功效存在明显差异,尤其是,似乎没有证据支持当前的国家卫生局(NHS)处方更昂贵的刺激性泻药的趋势。这个领域现在需要高质量的试验证据。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号