首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology >Plasma levels and clinical response with imipramine in a study comparing efficacy with mianserin and nomifensine
【2h】

Plasma levels and clinical response with imipramine in a study comparing efficacy with mianserin and nomifensine

机译:丙咪嗪的血浆水平和临床反应与米安色林和诺米芬的疗效比较研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>1 The comparative antidepressant efficacy of 150 mg imipramine, 60 mg mianserin and 150 mg nomifensine was studied in 45 depressed patients in a six week double-blind investigation.>2 In the efficacy analysis of 41 patients completing the study there was no overall significant difference in efficacy between the groups. Individual group comparisons showed no significant difference in response between mianserin and nomifensine, and mianserin and imipramine. There was a significant (z=1.99, P<0.05) improved response in the imipramine compared with the nomifensine treated group. The imipramine treated group were significantly older.>3 No significant plasma concentration/clinical response relationships were demonstrated with nomifensine, mianserin, imipramine or desipramine.>4 Plasma level monitoring of imipramine recommended by some investigators does not seem to be appropriate.
机译:> 1 在为期6周的双盲研究中,对45名抑郁症患者进行了150 mg丙米拉明,60 mg米安色林和150 mg nomifensine的抗抑郁药比较研究。> 2 对完成研究的41位患者进行的分析表明,两组之间的疗效没有总体上的显着差异。各个组的比较显示,米安色林和诺米芬新,米安色林和丙米拉明的反应无显着差异。与诺米芬治疗组相比,丙咪嗪的反应明显改善(z = 1.99,P <0.05)。丙咪嗪治疗组的年龄明显更大。> 3 。诺咪芬,米安色林,丙咪嗪或地昔帕明未显示出明显的血浆浓度/临床反应关系。> 4 一些调查员似乎不合适。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号