首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology >An intensive drug monitoring study suggesting possible clinical irrelevance of impaired drug disposition in liver disease.
【2h】

An intensive drug monitoring study suggesting possible clinical irrelevance of impaired drug disposition in liver disease.

机译:一项深入的药物监测研究表明肝脏疾病中药物处置受损的可能与临床无关。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

1 Liver disease can alter the disposition and clinical effects of drugs. However, even though altered drug disposition occurs, there is no clinical evidence relating it to an increased susceptibility to adverse drug reactions (ADRs). 2 An intensive prospective drug monitoring study of 2,582 hospitalized patients was conducted. The adverse drug reactions probability scale (APS) was used to assess ADRs. Only non-mild, definite or probable ADRs (APS greater than or equal to 5) were included. Severity of liver dysfunction was assessed by a composite clinical and laboratory index (CCLI). 3 The frequency of ADRs was higher in 402 patients with cirrhosis (27.4%) than in 661 with renal dysfunction (22.8%) and in 249 with other parenchymatous liver diseases (13.7%) or in 1,270 patients with neither liver diseases nor renal dysfunction (10.9%) (chi 2 3 = 85.53, P less than 0.001). The frequency of ADRs in cirrhotics was highly correlated with the severity of the liver dysfunction measured by CCLI (r = 0.82, P less than 0.001). 4 Drugs predominantly eliminated by liver metabolism were not among those most commonly inducing ADRs or those causing severe reactions in cirrhotics. Thus, frusemide caused the most common and the most severe ADRs, whereas reactions induced by sedatives were uncommon. Drug-induced hepatic encephalopathy was more common in cirrhotics receiving diuretics (13.3%) than in those receiving sedatives (1.8%) (chi 2 y.c. = 5.29, P less than 0.025). Patients with alcoholic liver disease had more drug-induced hepatic encephalopathy (7.7%) than those with non-alcoholic liver disease (1.2%) (chi 2 y.c. = 11.86, P less than 0.001). 5 These results indicate that susceptibility to ADRs is increased only in severe cirrhosis and that the most common and severe ADRs seem more likely related to enhanced pharmacodynamic action than to impaired drug disposition.
机译:1肝病可以改变药物的配置和临床效果。但是,即使发生了药物处置发生变化,也没有临床证据表明它与药物不良反应(ADR)的敏感性增加有关。 2对2582名住院患者进行了深入的前瞻性药物监测研究。使用药物不良反应概率量表(APS)评估ADR。仅包括非温和,确定或可能的ADR(APS大于或等于5)。肝功能不全的严重程度通过临床和实验室综合指标(CCLI)进行评估。 3 402例肝硬化患者(27.4%)的ADR发生率高于661例肾功能不全的患者(22.8%)和249例其他实质性肝病患者(13.7%)或1,270例既没有肝病也没有肾功能不全的患者( 10.9%)(chi 2 3 = 85.53,P小于0.001)。肝硬化患者中ADR的发生频率与CCLI测得的肝功能不全的严重程度高度相关(r = 0.82,P小于0.001)。 4主要通过肝脏代谢消除的药物不在最常引起ADR或引起肝硬化严重反应的药物之列。因此,弗留美引起最常见和最严重的不良反应,而镇静剂引起的反应并不常见。接受利尿剂治疗的肝硬化患者中药物诱发的肝性脑病(13.3%)比接受镇静剂的患者(1.8%)更常见(chi 2 y.c. = 5.29,P小于0.025)。酒精性肝病患者比非酒精性肝病患者的药物性肝性脑病(7.7%)多(chi 2 y.c. = 11.86,P小于0.001)。 5这些结果表明,仅在严重肝硬化中才增加对ADR的敏感性,并且最常见和最严重的ADR似乎更可能与药效作用增强有关,而不是与药物处置受损有关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号