首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>British Journal of Sports Medicine >Postexercise heart rates and pulse palpation as a means of determining exercising intensity in an aerobic dance class.
【2h】

Postexercise heart rates and pulse palpation as a means of determining exercising intensity in an aerobic dance class.

机译:运动后心律和脉搏触诊是确定有氧舞蹈课中锻炼强度的一种手段。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

OBJECTIVE--To establish the accuracy of the traditional method of measuring the intensity of exercise in aerobic dance classes, that is, intermittent pulse palpation performed during a brief cessation of activity. METHODS--A short wave telemetry system was used to record heart rates during a class in a group of 12 healthy women aged 26 (SD 6) years. Subjects palpated their pulses for 10 s following high and low intensity exercise [78(8)% and 69(9)% of mean predicted maximum heart rate respectively]. Recorded exercising heart rates, averaged over 60 s preceding pulse palpation [ExHR(rec)], were compared with the recorded postexercise heart rates averaged over the 10 s palpation period [PostExHR(rec)] and with the palpated counts (PalpHR). Differences were assessed using Student's t test and Wilcoxon signed rank test. RESULTS--Differences between ExHR(rec) and PostExHR(rec) following high and low intensity exercise [3(6) beats.min-1 and 5(7) beats.min-1 respectively] were not significant. However, the wide variation between subjects means that a postexercise heart rate is unreliable as a measure of individual exercise intensity. PalpHR was significantly lower than ExHR(rec) (P < 0.01). Every individually palpated count underestimated the exercising heart rate (range 9 to 95 beats.min-1). CONCLUSIONS--While postexercise heart rate adequately represents the exercise heart rate for a group, the individual variation is too wide for this to be a useful measurement.
机译:目的-建立有氧舞蹈课中传统的运动强度测量方法的准确性,即在短暂停止活动期间进行间歇性脉搏触诊的方法。方法-在一组12名年龄26(SD 6)岁的健康女性中,使用短波遥测系统记录了上课期间的心率。受试者在进行高强度和低强度运动后分别触摸其脉搏10 s [分别为平均预测最大心率的78(8)%和69(9)%]。将脉搏触诊前60 s内记录的平均运动心率[ExHR(rec)]与10 s触诊期间内记录的运动后心率[PostExHR(rec)]和心触计数(PalpHR)进行比较。差异使用Student's t检验和Wilcoxon符号秩检验进行评估。结果-高强度和低强度运动后[ExHR(rec)和PostExHR(rec)之间的差异[分别为3(6)beats.min-1和5(7)beats.min-1]不明显。但是,受试者之间的巨大差异意味着运动后的心率不可靠,无法衡量个人的运动强度。 PalpHR显着低于ExHR(rec)(P <0.01)。每个单独触诊的计数都低估了运动心率(范围为9到95 beats.min-1)。结论-尽管运动后心率足以代表一组人的运动心率,但个体差异太大以至于不能用作有用的测量指标。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号