首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Cancer Informatics >Assessment of Subnetwork Detection Methods for Breast Cancer
【2h】

Assessment of Subnetwork Detection Methods for Breast Cancer

机译:乳腺癌子网检测方法的评估

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Subnetwork detection is often used with differential expression analysis to identify modules or pathways associated with a disease or condition. Many computational methods are available for subnetwork analysis. Here, we compare the results of eight methods: simulated annealing–based jActiveModules, greedy search–based jActiveModules, DEGAS, BioNet, NetBox, ClustEx, OptDis, and NetWalker. These methods represent distinctly different computational strategies and are among the most widely used. Each of these methods was used to analyze gene expression data consisting of paired tumor and normal samples from 50 breast cancer patients. While the number of genes/proteins and protein interactions detected by the eight methods vary widely, a core set of 60 genes and 50 interactions was found to be shared by the subnetworks identified by five or more of the methods. Within the core set, 12 genes were found to be known breast cancer genes.
机译:子网检测通常与差异表达分析一起使用,以识别与疾病或状况相关的模块或途径。许多计算方法可用于子网分析。在这里,我们比较了8种方法的结果:基于模拟退火的jActiveModule,基于贪婪搜索的jActiveModule,DEGAS,BioNet,NetBox,ClustEx,OptDis和NetWalker。这些方法代表了截然不同的计算策略,并且是使用最广泛的方法之一。这些方法中的每一种都用于分析由50例乳腺癌患者的配对肿瘤和正常样品组成的基因表达数据。尽管通过八种方法检测到的基因/蛋白质和蛋白质相互作用的数量差异很大,但发现由五种或更多方法鉴定出的子网共享60个基因和50种相互作用的核心集。在核心组中,发现12个基因是已知的乳腺癌基因。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号