首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Case Reports in Oncological Medicine >Clinical Outcome of Third-Line Pazopanib in a Patient with Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma
【2h】

Clinical Outcome of Third-Line Pazopanib in a Patient with Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma

机译:转移性肾细胞癌患者三线帕唑帕尼的临床疗效

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Background. Renal cell carcinoma accounts for about 2-3% of all malignant tumors. The prevalence of brain metastases from RCC is less than 20% of cases. Traditionally, whole brain radiotherapy as well as the latest stereotactic radiosurgery improves both survival and local tumor control. These treatments also allow stabilization of clinical symptomatology. However, validated treatment guidelines for RCC patients with brain metastases are not yet available on account of the frequent exclusion of such patients from clinical trials. Moreover, limited data about the sequential use of three therapies, changing the class of agent, have been published up to now. Case Report. We report the case of a patient with metastatic RCC who developed disease progression after sunitinib and everolimus as first-line and second-line therapy, respectively. Thus, he underwent a multimodality treatment with pazopanib, as third-line therapy, to control systemic disease and radiosurgery directed on the new brain metastasis. To date, the patient is still receiving pazopanib, with progression-free survival and overall survival of 43 and 103 months, respectively. Conclusion. In a context characterized by different emerging options, with no general consensus on the optimal treatment strategy, the use of pazopanib in pretreated patients could be a suitable choice.
机译:背景。肾细胞癌约占所有恶性肿瘤的2-3%。 RCC发生脑转移的患病率不到20%。传统上,全脑放射疗法以及最新的立体定向放射外科手术可改善生存率和局部肿瘤控制。这些治疗还可以使临床症状稳定。然而,由于经常将这类患者排除在临床试验之外,因此尚无针对患有脑转移的RCC患者的有效治疗指南。而且,到目前为止,关于改变治疗剂类别的三种疗法的顺序使用的有限数据已经发表。案例报告。我们报道一例转移性RCC患者在舒尼替尼和依维莫司分别作为一线和二线治疗后发生疾病进展。因此,他接受了帕唑帕尼的多模式治疗作为三线治疗,以控制针对新的脑转移的全身性疾病和放射外科手术。迄今为止,患者仍在接受帕唑帕尼治疗,无进展生存期和总生存期分别为43个月和103个月。结论。在出现不同选择的情况下,对于最佳治疗策略尚无普遍共识,在预处理患者中使用帕唑帕尼可能是合适的选择。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号