首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>The Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine >Motor levels in high cervical spinal cord injuries: Implications for the International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury
【2h】

Motor levels in high cervical spinal cord injuries: Implications for the International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury

机译:高颈椎脊髓损伤中的运动水平:对国际脊髓损伤神经分类标准的启示

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Context/Objective: To verify the hypothesis that motor levels (ML) inferred from sensory levels in the upper cervical segments C2–C4 according to the current version of the International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury (ISNCSCI) are counterintuitive in cases where the most rostral myotomes C5 and C6 are graded as intact.>Design: Prospective cohort study of ISNCSCI instructional course participants completing a post-test after the workshop to determine the MLs in two variants of a complete, high cervical spinal cord injury (SCI) case scenario. Both variants were based on the same ISNCSCI sensory and MLs of C2. In the first variant myotomes C5 and C6 were bilaterally graded as intact, while in variant 2 only active movements against gravity were possible (grade 3).>Setting: Eight ISNCSCI instructional courses conducted during the study period from November 2012 until March 2015 in the framework of the European Multicenter Study on Human Spinal Cord Injury (EMSCI— ).>Participants: Ninety-two clinicians from twenty-two SCI centers. Most of the attendees were physicians (58.7%) or physical therapists (33.7%) and had less than one year (44.6%) experience in SCI medicine.>Interventions: Not applicable.>Outcome Measure: The classification performance described as percentage of correctly determined MLs by the clinicians.>Results: Variant 2 (89.13%) was significantly (P < 0.0001) better classified than variant 1 (65.76%). In variant 1 with intact myotomes at C5 and C6, C6 was incorrectly classified as the ML by the clinicians in 33.15% of all cases, whereas in variant 2 with non-intact C5 / C6 myotomes, C6 was rarely chosen (2.17%).>Conclusions: Sensory level deferred MLs in the high cervical region of C2–C4 are counterintuitive whenever the most rostral cervical myotomes are intact. An adjustment of the ML definition in ISNCSCI may be needed.
机译:>背景/目标:根据国际脊髓损伤神经分类国际标准(以下版本),验证以下假设:运动水平(ML)由上颈段C2-C4的感觉水平推断得出如果将大多数延髓部肌源性C5和C6分级为完整,则ISNCSCI是违反直觉的。>设计:对ISNCSCI教学课程参与者的前瞻性队列研究完成了研讨会后的后测,以确定两个ML完整的高颈椎脊髓损伤(SCI)案例的变体。两种变体均基于相同的ISNCSCI感官和C2的ML。在第一个变体中,肌钙蛋白C5和C6双向分级为完整,而在变体2中,只能进行主动重力运动(3级)。>设置:从11月开始的研究期间,共进行了8次ISNCSCI教学课程2012年至2015年3月,在“欧洲人类脊髓损伤多中心研究”(EMSCI—)的框架内。>参与者:来自22个SCI中心的92位临床医生。大多数参加者是医师(58.7%)或物理治疗师(33.7%),并且在SCI医学方面的经验不足一年(44.6%)。>干预:不适用。>结果衡量标准< / strong>:分类性能描述为临床医生正确确定的ML的百分比。>结果:变体2(89.13%)的分类效果显着(P <)0.0001)比变体1(65.76%)更好。在C5和C6处有完整的同位素的变体1中,在所有病例中,C6被临床医生错误地分类为ML,占所有病例的33.15%,而在C5 / C6肌无完整性的变体2中,很少选择C6(2.17%)。 >结论:只要完整的头侧颈肌肌完整,在C2–C4高颈区的感觉水平延迟的MLs是违反直觉的。可能需要调整ISNCSCI中的ML定义。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号