首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Sports Science Medicine >The Development and Validation of a Golf Swing and Putt Skill Assessment for Children
【2h】

The Development and Validation of a Golf Swing and Putt Skill Assessment for Children

机译:儿童高尔夫挥杆和推杆技巧评估的发展与验证

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The aim was to describe development of a process-oriented instrument designed to assess the golf swing and putt stroke, and to assess the instrument’s discriminative validity in terms of age and reliability (intra-rater and re-test). A Delphi consultation (with golf industry professionals and researchers in movement skill assessment) was used to develop an assessment for each skill based on existing skill assessment protocols. Each skill had six components to be marked as present/absent. Individual scores were based on the number of performance components successfully demonstrated over two trials for each skill (potential score range 0 to 24). Children (n = 43) aged 6-10 years (M = 7.8 years, SD = 1.3) were assessed in both skills live in the field by one rater at Time 1(T1). A subset of children (n = 28) had consent for assessments to be videoed. Six weeks later 19 children were reassessed, five days apart (T2, T3). An ANOVA assessed discriminative validity i.e. whether skill competence at T1 differed by age (6 years, 7/8 years and 9/10 years). Intraclass correlations (ICC) assessed intra-rater reliability between the live and video assessment at T1 and test-retest reliability (between T2 and T3). Paired t-tests assessed any systematic differences between live and video assessments (T1) and between T2 and T3. Older children were more skilled (F (2, 40) = 11.18, p < 0.001). The live assessment reflected the video assessment (ICC = 0.79, 95% CI 0.59, 0.90) and scores did not differ between live and video assessments. Test retest reliability was acceptable (ICC = 0.60, 95% CI 0.23, 0.82), although the mean score was slightly higher at retest. This instrument could be used reliably by golf coaches and physical education teachers as part of systematic early player assessment and feedback.Key points class="unordered" style="list-style-type:disc">Golf is becoming an increasingly popular sport among young children, however there is no standard protocol available to assess and identify skill deficits, mastery level, and talent identification in beginner young golf players.Process rather than product oriented outcomes better identify areas of skill deficit in young children.The proposed swing and putt instrument can reliably identify skill deficits in children of elementary school age who are new to golf and can be used by a range of stakeholders including golf coaches, generalist sport coaches and physical education teachers.
机译:目的是描述一种面向过程的仪器的开发,该仪器旨在评估高尔夫球的挥杆和推杆击打,并评估该仪器在年龄和可靠性方面的判别有效性(评估者内部和重新测试)。使用Delphi咨询(与高尔夫行业专业人士和运动技能评估研究人员进行磋商),根据现有技能评估协议为每种技能制定评估。每个技能都有六个要标记为存在/不存在的组件。个别分数是基于两项技能中两项技能成功展示的表现成分数量(潜在分数范围为0到24)。在时间1(T1)由一位评估者评估了6-10岁(M = 7.8岁,SD = 1.3)年龄在6岁至10岁(M = 7.8岁,SD = 1.3)中的儿童的两种技能。一部分儿童(n = 28)同意将评估视频录入视频。六周后,重新评估了19名儿童,相隔五天(T2,T3)。 ANOVA评估判别效度,即T1的技能胜任力是否因年龄(6岁,7/8岁和9/10岁)而异。类内相关性(ICC)评估了T1实时和视频评估之间的评估者内部可靠性以及重测可靠性(T2和T3之间)。配对的t检验可以评估实时评估和视频评估(T1)之间以及T2和T3之间的系统差异。大一点的孩子技能更高(F(2,40)= 11.18,p <0.001)。实时评估反映了视频评估(ICC = 0.79,95%CI 0.59,0.90),实时评估和视频评估之间的得分没有差异。测试重测可靠性是可以接受的(ICC = 0.60,95%CI 0.23,0.82),尽管重测的平均评分略高。高尔夫教练和体育教师可以可靠地使用此工具,作为系统的早期球员评估和反馈的一部分。要点 class =“ unordered” style =“ list-style-type:disc”> <!-list-行为=无序的前缀词=标记类型=光盘max-label-size = 0-> 高尔夫正在成为幼儿中越来越流行的运动,但是尚无标准协议可用于评估和识别技能缺陷, 以过程而非产品为导向的结果可以更好地识别幼儿的技能缺陷区域。 所提出的挥杆和推杆工具可以可靠地实现识别小学年龄段儿童的技能缺陷,他们是高尔夫新手,可以被高尔夫教练,通才运动教练和体育老师等广泛的利益相关者所利用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号