首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Sports Science Medicine >Arm vs. Combined Leg and Arm Exercise: Blood Pressure Responses and Ratings of Perceived Exertion at the Same Indirectly Determined Heart Rate
【2h】

Arm vs. Combined Leg and Arm Exercise: Blood Pressure Responses and Ratings of Perceived Exertion at the Same Indirectly Determined Heart Rate

机译:手臂vs.腿部和手臂联合运动:在相同间接确定的心率下的血压反应和运动强度

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Pre-participation screening is very important for prescribing and practising exercise safely. The aim of this study was to investigate both ratings of perceived exertion (RPE) and blood pressure responses in two different types of exercises with matching duration and indirectly determined working heart rate (HR). Participants were 23 male students, who were generally healthy but sedentary. The time course of their RPE and blood pressure during a 50- minute work-out session on an arm crank ergometer and a cross trainer were compared. RM-ANOVA showed both a higher RPE (p < 0.001) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) (p < 0.001) response to the arm exercise that were shown significantly correlated (r = 0.883; p = 0.008). Linear regression analysis (p = 0.001) confirmed the ability to predict the time course of DBP by knowing the RPE on the arm crank ergometer. Even if people use the recommended relative intensity, the HR method is not always safe for health without pre-participation screening because exercise characteristics can negatively influence physiological responses. The HR method could be substituted by the RPE method.Key points class="unordered" style="list-style-type:disc">Arm Crank Ergometer elicits a higher diastolic blood pressure response respect to Cross Trainer when people exercise at the same heart rate.Arm Crank Ergometer elicits a higher ratings of perceived exertion respect to Cross trainer when people exercise at the same heart rate.Indirect determined working heart rate is not always safe even if the theoretical intensity is that recommended for health.Rating of perceived exertion method should be used instead of heart rate method to avoid the dangerous physiological responses observed.
机译:参与前检查对于安全地开处方和进行锻炼非常重要。这项研究的目的是调查两种不同类型的锻炼中的感知劳累(RPE)等级和血压反应,两者具有匹配的持续时间和间接确定的工作心率(HR)。参加者为23名男学生,他们总体上健康但久坐。比较了他们在摇臂测力计和交叉训练机上进行的50分钟锻炼期间其RPE的时程和血压。 RM-ANOVA显示较高的RPE(p <0.001)和舒张压(DBP)(p <0.001)对手臂运动的反应均显示出显着相关性(r = 0.883; p = 0.008)。线性回归分析(p = 0.001)通过了解曲柄测功机上的RPE证实了预测DBP时间过程的能力。即使人们使用推荐的相对强度,如果没有参加参与筛查,HR方法也不总是对健康有益,因为运动特征可能会对生理反应产生负面影响。 HR方法可以用RPE方法代替。要点 class =“ unordered” style =“ list-style-type:disc”> <!-list-behavior = unordered prefix-word = mark-type = disc max-label-size = 0-> 当人们以相同的心律运动时,手臂曲柄测力计相对于Cross Trainer会引起更高的舒张压反应。 手臂曲柄测力计会产生更高的评分人以相同的心率运动时对交叉训练机感觉的劳累尊重。 即使理论强度是建议的健康强度,间接确定的工作心率也不总是安全的。 应该使用感知劳累法评分而不是心率法,以避免观察到危险的生理反应。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号