首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications >The reporting quality of abstracts of stepped wedge randomized trials is suboptimal: A systematic survey of the literature
【2h】

The reporting quality of abstracts of stepped wedge randomized trials is suboptimal: A systematic survey of the literature

机译:分步楔形随机试验的摘要报告质量欠佳:对文献的系统调查

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

BackgroundThe stepped wedge trial (SWT) design is a type of the randomized clinical trial (RCT) design in which clusters or individuals are randomly and sequentially crossed over from control to intervention over a number of time periods. Trials using SWT design have become increasingly popular in medical, behavioral and social sciences research. Therefore, complete and transparent reporting of these studies is crucial. In particular, the quality of the abstracts of their reports is important because these may be the only accessible sources for their results.
机译:背景技术逐步楔入试验(SWT)设计是随机临床试验(RCT)设计的一种,其中,在多个时间段内,将群体或个体随机且顺序地从对照组转移到干预组。使用SWT设计的试验已在医学,行为和社会科学研究领域变得越来越流行。因此,完整,透明地报告这些研究至关重要。特别是,其报告摘要的质量很重要,因为它们可能是其结果的唯一可访问来源。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号