首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Current Therapeutic Research Clinical and Experimental >The efficacy and tolerability of glucosamine sulfate in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis: A randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial
【2h】

The efficacy and tolerability of glucosamine sulfate in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis: A randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial

机译:氨基葡萄糖硫酸盐治疗膝部骨关节炎的功效和耐受性:一项随机双盲安慰剂对照试验

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Background: Osteoarthritis (OA) is the most common form of arthritis and is often associated with disability and impaired quality of life.>Objective: The aim of the study was to assess the efficacy and tolerability of glucosamine sulfate (GS) in the treatment of knee OA.>Methods: Consecutive outpatients affected by primary monolateral or bilateral knee OA were enrolled in this double-blind, double-dummy, prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. One group received GS 1500 mg QD for 12 weeks, and the other group received placebo QD for 12 weeks. The treatment period was followed by a 12-week treatment-free observation phase. Each patient was examined at baseline and at weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24. The primary efficacy criteria were pain at rest and during movement, assessed on a visual analog scale (VAS) of 0 to 100 mm. The secondary criteria included the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) index for total pain score (W-TPS), total stiffness score (W-TSS), and total physical function score (W-TPFS). VAS, W-TPS, W-TSS, and W-TPFS were evaluated at baseline and at weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24. Analgesic drug consumption (ie, acetaminophen or NSAIDs) was also assessed.>Results: Patient demographics were similar in the GS and placebo groups. Of 60 randomized patients (30 per group), 56 completed the study (28 treated with GS and 28 who received placebo). Statistically significant improvements in symptomatic knee OA were observed, as measured by differences in resting pain at weeks 8, 12, and 16 (all, P < 0.05 vs placebo) and in pain during movement at weeks 12 and 16 (both, P < 0.05). W-TPS was lower with GS than placebo at weeks 8, 12, and 16 (all, P < 0.01), and at week 20 (P < 0.05). W-TSS was also lower with GS than placebo at weeks 8, 12, 16, and 20 (all, P < 0.05). W-TPFS was lower with GS than placebo at weeks 8 (P < 0.05), 12 (P < 0.01), 16 (P < 0.05), and 20 (P < 0.05). Drug consumption was lower in the GS group than the placebo group at weeks 8, 12, 16, and 20 (all, P < 0.05). The incidence of adverse events was 36.7% with GS and 40.0% with placebo.>Conclusions: GS 1500 mg QD PO for 12 weeks was associated with statistically significant reductions in pain and improvements in functioning, with decreased analgesic consumption, compared with baseline and placebo in these patients with knee OA. A carryover effect was detected after treatment ended.
机译:>背景:骨关节炎(OA)是最常见的关节炎形式,通常与残疾和生活质量受损有关。>目的:该研究的目的是评估骨关节炎氨基葡萄糖硫酸盐(GS)治疗膝骨关节炎的疗效和耐受性,安慰剂对照试验。一组接受GS 1500 mg QD治疗12周,另一组接受安慰剂QD治疗12周。治疗期后为12周的无治疗观察期。在基线以及第4、8、12、16、20和24周时对每位患者进行检查。主要功效标准为休息和运动过程中的疼痛,以0至100 mm的视觉模拟评分(VAS)进行评估。次要标准包括西安大略大学和麦克马斯特大学(WOMAC)的总疼痛评分(W-TPS),总硬度评分(W-TSS)和总身体功能评分(W-TPFS)指数。在基线以及第4、8、12、16、20和24周时评估了VAS,W-TPS,W-TSS和W-TPFS。还评估了镇痛药的消耗量(即对乙酰氨基酚或NSAIDs)。 >结果:GS和安慰剂组的患者人口统计数据相似。在60名随机分组的患者(每组30名)中,有56名完成了研究(28名接受GS治疗的患者和28名接受安慰剂的患者)。从第8、12和16周静息痛的差异(均P <0.05,与安慰剂相比)以及在运动第12和16周疼痛(均P <0.05 )。 GS的W-TPS在第8、12和16周(所有,P <0.01)和第20周(P <0.05)都低于安慰剂。 GS的W-TSS在第8、12、16和20周时也低于安慰剂(所有,P <0.05)。 GS的W-TPFS在第8周(P <0.05),12(P <0.01),16(P <0.05)和20(P <0.05)时低于安慰剂。在第8、12、16和20周,GS组的药物消耗低于安慰剂组(所有,P <0.05)。 GS的不良事件发生率为36.7%,安慰剂为40.0%。>结论: GS 1500 mg的QD PO持续12周与疼痛的统计显着减少和功能改善相关,并且止痛药的使用量减少与基线和安慰剂相比,这些膝关节OA患者。治疗结束后检测到残留效应。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号