首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Current Urology >Advances in Male Reproductive Surgery: Robotic-Assisted Vasovasostomy
【2h】

Advances in Male Reproductive Surgery: Robotic-Assisted Vasovasostomy

机译:男性生殖手术的进展:机器人辅助血管迷走吻合术

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

It is estimated that 3–6% of all vasectomised men request vasectomy reversal for different reasons. Microsurgical vasovasostomy is the gold standard technique of vasectomy reversal. However, the microsurgical technique is time-consuming and challenging to most urological surgeons. Therefore, alternative methods of vasal anastomosis have been studied including robotic-assisted vasovasostomy. This review discusses the feasibility and practice of robotic-assisted vasovasostomy. Based on the available studies robotic-assisted vasovasostomy is feasible. The reported rate of vasal patency associated with this new technique is similar to that of microsurgical vasovasostomy. There is no clear difference between the 2 approaches in terms of operating time. Robotic-assisted vasovasostomy does not appear to afford significant advantages in the era of vasectomy reversal.
机译:据估计,在所有输精管切开术的男性中,有3–6%的患者因不同原因要求输精管切除术。显微外科输精管吻合术是输精管切除术的金标准技术。然而,显微外科技术对大多数泌尿外科医师而言既费时又具有挑战性。因此,已经研究了包括血管辅助吻合术在内的替代性血管吻合方法。这篇综述讨论了机器人辅助血管吻合术的可行性和实践。根据现有研究,机器人辅助血管迷路吻合术是可行的。与这项新技术相关的血管通畅率报道与显微外科血管输卵管吻合术相似。在操作时间方面,两种方法之间没有明显区别。在输精管切除术逆转的时代,机器人辅助输精管吻合术似乎没有提供明显的优势。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号