首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>World Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy >Withdrawal time in excellent or very poor bowel preparation qualities
【2h】

Withdrawal time in excellent or very poor bowel preparation qualities

机译:肠准备质量优异或非常差的退出时间

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

AIM: To evaluate association(s) between withdrawal time and polyp detection in various bowel preparation qualities.METHODS: Retrospective cohort analysis of screening colonoscopies performed between January 2005 and June 2011 for patients with average risk of colorectal cancer. Exclusion criteria included patients with a personal history of adenomatous polyps or colon cancer, prior colonic resection, significant family history of colorectal cancer, screening colonoscopy after other abnormal screening tests such as flexible sigmoidoscopy or barium enema, and screening colonoscopies during in-patient care. All procedures were performed or directly supervised by gastroenterologists. Main measurements were number of colonic segments with polyps and total number of colonic polyps.RESULTS: Multivariate analysis of 8331 colonoscopies showed longer withdrawal time was associated with more colonic segments with polyps in good (adjusted OR = 1.16; 95%CI: 1.13-1.19), fair (OR = 1.13; 95%CI: 1.10-1.17), and poor (OR = 1.18; 95%CI: 1.11-1.26) bowel preparation qualities. A higher number of total polyps was associated with longer withdrawal time in good (OR = 1.15; 95%CI: 1.13-1.18), fair (OR = 1.13; 95%CI: 1.10-1.16), and poor (OR = 1.20; 95%CI: 1.13-1.29) bowel preparation qualities. Longer withdrawal time was not associated with more colonic segments with polyps or greater number of colonic polyps in bowel preparations with excellent (OR = 1.07, 95%CI: 0.99-1.26; OR = 1.11, 95%CI: 0.99-1.24, respectively) and very poor (OR = 1.02, 95%CI: 0.99-1.12; OR = 1.05, 95%CI: 0.99-1.10, respectively) qualities.CONCLUSION: Longer withdrawal time is not associated with higher polyp number detected in colonoscopies with excellent or very poor bowel preparation quality.
机译:目的:评估在不同肠准备质量下撤药时间与息肉检测之间的关联。方法:回顾性队列研究分析2005年1月至2011年6月间筛查结肠直肠癌患者的平均结肠直肠癌风险。排除标准包括患有腺瘤性息肉或结肠癌的个人病史,结肠切除前的病史,大肠癌的重要家族史,在其他异常筛查试验(如柔性乙状结肠镜检查或钡灌肠)后进行结肠镜检查,以及在住院期间筛查结肠镜检查的患者。所有程序均由胃肠病医生执行或直接监督。结果:对8331例结肠镜检查的多变量分析显示,较长的停药时间与更多的息肉结肠切片相关(校正OR = 1.16; 95%CI:1.13-1.19) ),中等(OR = 1.13; 95%CI:1.10-1.17)和较差(OR = 1.18; 95%CI:1.11-1.26)肠道准备质量。良好的总息肉数目与较高的撤回时间相关(OR = 1.15; 95%CI:1.13-1.18),中等(OR = 1.13; 95%CI:1.10-1.16)和较差(OR = 1.20; 95%CI:1.13-1.29)肠道准备质量。较长的停药时间与具有优良息肉的肠制剂中更多的结肠息肉息肉或更多的结肠息肉息息相关(分别为OR = 1.07,95%CI:0.99-1.26; OR = 1.11,95%CI:0.99-1.24)结论:较长的停药时间与较高或较高结肠镜检查中发现的息肉数目无关,而更长的停药时间与较高的息肉数量无关。(或= 1.02,95%CI:0.99-1.12; OR = 1.05,95%CI:0.99-1.10)肠道准备质量非常差。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号