首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>World Journal of Nephrology >Choice of dialysis modality prior to kidney transplantation: Does it matter?
【2h】

Choice of dialysis modality prior to kidney transplantation: Does it matter?

机译:肾脏移植前透析方式的选择:有关系吗?

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The population of patients with end stage renal disease (ESRD) is increasing, lengthening waiting lists for kidney transplantation. Majority of the patients are not able to receive a kidney transplant in timely manner even though it is well established that patient survival and quality of life after kidney transplantation is far better when compared to being on dialysis. A large number of patients who desire a kidney transplant ultimately end up needing some form of dialysis therapy. Most of incident ESRD patients choose hemodialysis (HD) over peritoneal dialysis (PD) as the modality of choice in the United States, even though studies have favored PD as a better choice of pre-transplant dialysis modality than HD. PD is largely underutilized in the United States due to variety of reasons. As a part of the decision making process, patients are often educated how the choice regarding modality of dialysis would fit into their life but it is not clear and not usually discussed, how it can affect eventual kidney transplantation in the future. In this article we would like to discuss ESRD demographics and outcomes, modality of dialysis and kidney transplant related events. We have summarized the data comparing PD and HD as the modality of dialysis and its impact on allograft and recipient outcomes after kidney transplantation.
机译:患有终末期肾病(ESRD)的患者人数正在增加,从而延长了肾脏移植的等待名单。大多数患者无法及时接受肾脏移植,即使众所周知,与透析相比,患者的存活率和生活质量要好得多。许多希望进行肾脏移植的患者最终最终需要某种形式的透析治疗。在美国,大多数ESRD病患选择血液透析(HD)而非腹膜透析(PD)作为选择方式,尽管研究偏爱将PD作为移植前透析方式比HD更好的选择。由于各种原因,PD在美国未得到充分利用。作为决策过程的一部分,通常会告知患者有关透析方式的选择如何适应他们的生活,但目前尚不清楚,而且通常不会讨论,它如何影响将来的最终肾脏移植。在本文中,我们将讨论ESRD的人口统计学和结果,透析方式以及与肾脏移植相关的事件。我们总结了将PD和HD作为透析方式及其对肾脏移植后同种异体移植和受体结果的影响进行比较的数据。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号