首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>World Journal of Gastroenterology >Should hot biopsy forceps be abandoned for polypectomy of diminutive colorectal polyps?
【2h】

Should hot biopsy forceps be abandoned for polypectomy of diminutive colorectal polyps?

机译:是否应放弃热活检钳用于结直肠息肉缩小的息肉切除术?

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Standardized approach to polypectomy of diminutive colorectal polyps (DCPs) is lacking since cold biopsy forceps have been associated with high levels of recurrence, hot biopsy forceps are considered inadequate and risky and cold snaring is currently under investigation for its efficacy and safety. This has led to confusion and a gap in clinical practice. This article discusses the usefulness and contemporary practical applicability of hot biopsy forceps and provides well-intentioned criticism of the new European guidelines for the treatment of DCPs. Diminutive colorectal polyps are a source of frustration for the endoscopist since their small size is accompanied by a considerable risk of premalignant neoplasia and a small but non-negligible risk of advanced neoplasia and even cancer. Since the proportion of diminutive colorectal polyps is substantial and exceeds that of larger polyps, their effective removal poses a considerable workload and a therapeutic challenge. During the last decade, the introduction of cold snaring to routine endoscopy practice has attempted to overcome the use of prior techniques, such as hot biopsy forceps. It is important to recognize that with the exception of endoscopic methods that are obviously unsafe and inadequate to serve their purpose, all other interventional endoscopic methods are operator-dependent in the sense that specific expertise and training are obligatory for the success of any therapeutic intervention. Since relevant publications on hot biopsy forceps are still in favor of its careful use, as it has not yet demonstrated inferiority compared with newer techniques, it would be prudent for any medical practitioner to evaluate the available tools and judge any new proposed technique based on the evidence before it is adopted.
机译:由于冷活检钳与高复发率相关联,因此缺乏标准化的大肠息肉切除术(DCPs)的标准化方法,热活检钳被认为是不充分的,并且由于其功效和安全性,目前正在对冷活检进行风险研究。这导致了混乱和临床实践的空白。本文讨论了热活检钳的实用性和当代实用性,并对欧洲治疗DCP的新指南提出了明确的批评。肠内科医师认为小肠息肉是一个挫败的原因,因为它们的小尺寸伴随着相当大的发生恶变前肿瘤的风险以及很小但不可忽略的晚期肿瘤甚至癌症的风险。由于大肠息肉的比例很小且超过了大息肉的比例,因此有效去除这些息肉会带来相当大的工作量和治疗挑战。在过去的十年中,将冷声法引入常规内窥镜检查实践中试图克服现有技术的使用,例如热活检钳。重要的是要认识到,除了显然不安全且不足以实现其目的的内窥镜检查方法外,所有其他介入性内窥镜检查方法都依赖于操作员,因为必须有特定的专业知识和培训才能使任何治疗性干预措施取得成功。由于有关热活检钳的相关出版物仍支持谨慎使用,因为与新技术相比还没有表现出自卑性,因此任何医生都应谨慎评估可用的工具并根据新技术来判断任何新提议的技术。被采用之前的证据。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号