首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>World Journal of Gastroenterology >Modified sequential therapy vs quadruple therapy as initial therapy in patients with Helicobacter infection
【2h】

Modified sequential therapy vs quadruple therapy as initial therapy in patients with Helicobacter infection

机译:改良顺序疗法与四联疗法作为幽门螺杆菌感染患者的初始治疗

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

AIM: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of modified sequential therapy and to compare modified sequential therapy with standard quadruple therapy for Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) eradication.METHODS: In total, 200 consecutive patients who were diagnosed with H. pylori-infected chronic gastritis by electronic endoscopy and rapid urease testing from December 2012 to October 2013 were enrolled in this study. The patients had not previously received H. pylori eradication treatment, and were randomized into two groups. The patients in Group A (n = 101) were treated with ilaprazole + bismuth potassium citrate + amoxicillin and clavulanate potassium + levofloxacin, and the patients in Group B (n = 99) were administered a modified sequential therapy composed of ilaprazole at 5 mg bid and amoxicillin and clavulanate potassium at 914 mg for the first five days followed by ilaprazole at 5 mg bid, furazolidone at 100 mg bid and levofloxacin at 500 mg qid for the next five days. Four to six weeks after the end of treatment, a 14C-urea breath test was performed for all the subjects to confirm the eradication of H. pylori. The intention-to-treat and per-protocol eradication rates were determined.RESULTS: A total of 190 of the 200 patients completed the study. All 200 patients were included in the intention-to-treat analysis, whereas 190 patients were included in the per-protocol analysis. In the intention-to-treat analysis, the rates of H. pylori eradication in Groups A and B were 85.15% (86/101) and 81.82% (81/99), respectively. In the per-protocol analysis, the H. pylori eradication rates in Groups A and B were 88.66% (86/97) and 87.09% (81/93), respectively. No significant difference was observed (χ2 = 0.109, P = 0.741) in the eradication rate between Groups A and B. The rates of adverse effects observed in the groups were similar at 6.19% (6/97) for Group A and 7.53% (7/93) for Group B (P > 0.05). No mortality or major morbidities were observed in any of the patients. Symptomatic improvements in the presentation of stomachache, acid regurgitation, and burning sensation were not significantly different between the two groups.CONCLUSION: Ilaprazole-based 10-d standard quadruple therapy does not offer an incremental benefit over modified sequential therapy for the treatment of H. pylori infection, as both treatment regimens appear to be effective, safe, and well-tolerated as initial treatment options.
机译:目的:评价改良序贯疗法的疗效和安全性,并将改良序贯疗法与标准的四联疗法根除幽门螺杆菌(幽门螺杆菌)进行比较。方法:总共,连续200例被诊断为幽门螺杆菌感染的慢性患者本研究纳入了通过电子内窥镜检查进行的胃炎和2012年12月至2013年10月的快速尿素酶检测。患者先前未接受根除幽门螺杆菌的治疗,被随机分为两组。 A组(n = 101)的患者接受了ilaprazole +柠檬酸铋钾+阿莫西林和克拉维酸钾+ levofloxacin的治疗,B组(n = 99)的患者接受了改良的序贯治疗,包括5 mg bid的ilaprazole前五天服用914毫克的阿莫西林和克拉维酸钾,随后五天服用5毫克bid的艾拉拉唑,100毫克bid的呋喃唑酮和500毫克qid的左氧氟沙星。治疗结束后四到六周,对所有受试者进行了14C-尿素呼气试验,以确认根除幽门螺杆菌。确定了意向性治疗和每方案的根除率。结果:200名患者中有190名完成了研究。所有200例患者都包括在意向治疗分析中,而190例患者包括在按方案分析中。在意向性治疗分析中,A组和B组的幽门螺杆菌根除率分别为85.15%(86/101)和81.82%(81/99)。在按协议分析中,A组和B组的幽门螺杆菌根除率分别为88.66%(86/97)和87.09%(81/93)。 A组和B组之间的根除率无显着差异(χ 2 = 0.109,P = 0.741)。各组中观察到的不良反应率相似,为6.19%(6/97) )(A组)和7.53%(7/93)(B组)(P> 0.05)。在任何患者中均未观察到死亡率或主要发病率。两组在胃痛,酸反流和烧灼感方面的症状改善无显着差异。结论:基于伊拉唑的10 d标准四联疗法对H的改良序贯疗法没有提供增加的益处。幽门螺杆菌感染,因为这两种治疗方案似乎都是有效,安全且耐受性良好的初始治疗选择。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号