首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>World Journal of Gastroenterology >Missed diagnosis of early gastric cancer or high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia
【2h】

Missed diagnosis of early gastric cancer or high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia

机译:早期胃癌或高级别上皮内瘤变的漏诊诊断

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

AIM: To investigate the causes of missed diagnosis of early gastric cancer (EGC) or high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia (HGIN) in Chongqing, China.METHODS: The present study summarizes 103 cases of EGC/HGIN detected by esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) and pathological analysis from January 2010 to December 2011. Dimethyl silicone oil was administrated orally 15 min before the EGD procedures. The stomach was cleaned by repeated washing with saline when the gastroscope entered the stomach cavity. Suspected EGC lesions were subject to conventional biopsy sampling and pathological examinations. The correlation between lesion locations, endoscopic morphology of cancerous sites, training level of the examiners, pathological biopsies, and missed diagnosis was analyzed.RESULTS: Twenty-three cases were missed among the 103 cases (22.23%) of EGC/HGIN. The rate of missed EGC in the gastroesophageal junction (8/19, 42.1%) was significantly higher than at other sites (15/84, 17.86%) (χ2 = 5.253, P = 0.022). In contrast, the rate of missed EGC in the lower stomach body (2/14, 14.29%) was lower than at other sites (21/89, 23.6%), but there were no significant differences (χ2 = 0.289, P = 0.591). The rate of missed EGC in the gastric antrum (5/33, 15.15%) was lower than at other sites (18/70, 25.71%), but there were no significant differences (χ2 = 1.443, P = 0.230). Endoscopists from less prestigious hospitals were more prone to not diagnosing EGC than those from more prestigious hospitals (χ2 = 4.261, P = 0.039). When the number of biopsies was < 4, the rate of missed diagnosis was higher (20/23, 89.96%) than for when there were > 4 biopsies (3/23, 13.04%) (P < 0.001). In addition, there was no significant difference in the rate of missed diagnosis in patients with 1-3 biopsy specimens (χ2 = 0.141, P = 0.932).CONCLUSION: Endoscopists should have a clear understanding of the anatomical characteristics of the esophagus/stomach, and endoscopic identification of early lesions increases with the number of biopsies.
机译:目的:探讨重庆市早期胃癌(EGC)或高度上皮内瘤变(HGIN)漏诊的原因。方法:本研究总结了103例经食管胃十二指肠镜检查(EGD)和病理检查发现的EGC / HGIN病例分析从2010年1月至2011年12月。在进行EGD程序前15分钟,口服二甲基硅油。当胃镜进入胃腔时,通过用盐水反复洗涤来清洁胃。疑似EGC病变需进行常规活检和病理检查。分析了病变部位,内镜形态,癌变部位,检查者的培训水平,病理活检和漏诊之间的相关性。结果:103例EGC / HGIN漏诊了23例,占22.23%。胃食管连接处的EGC漏检率(8/19,42.1%)显着高于其他部位(15/84,17.86%)(χ 2 = 5.253,P = 0.022)。相比之下,下胃体的EGC漏检率(2/14,14.29%)低于其他部位(21/89,23.6%),但没有显着差异(χ 2 = 0.289,P = 0.591)。胃窦EGC漏诊率(5/33,15.15%)低于其他部位(18/70,25.71%),但差异无统计学意义(χ 2 = 1.443 ,P = 0.230)。来自知名度较低的医院的内镜医师比具有较高声誉的医院的内镜医师更倾向于不诊断EGC(χ 2 = 4.261,P = 0.039)。当活检次数<4时,漏诊诊断率(20 / 23,89.96%)高于活检次数> 4时(3 / 23,13.04%)(P <0.001)。此外,在1-3例活检标本中,漏诊率没有显着差异(χ 2 = 0.141,P = 0.932)。结论:内镜医师应对食管/胃的解剖特征以及早期病变的内窥镜识别随着活检次数的增加而增加。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号