首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>World Journal of Gastroenterology >Anti-HBV effect of liposome-encapsulated matrine in vitro and in vivo
【2h】

Anti-HBV effect of liposome-encapsulated matrine in vitro and in vivo

机译:脂质体包裹苦参碱的体内外抗HBV作用

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

AIM: To study the anti-HBV effect of liposome-encapsulated matrine (Lip-M) in vitro and in vivo.METHODS: 2.2.15 cell line was cultured in vitro to observe the effect of Lip-M and matrine on the secretion of HBsAg and HBeAg. The toxicity of Lip-M and matrine to 2.2.15 cell line was also studied by MTT method. In in vivo study, drug treatment experiment was carried out on the 13th day after ducks were infected with duck hepatitis B virus (DHBV). The ducks were randomly divided into 4 groups with 5-6 ducks in each group. Lip-M and matrine were given to DHBV-infected ducks respectively by gastric perfusion. Four groups were observed: group of Lip-M (20 mg/kg), group of Lip-M (10 mg/kg), group of matrine (20 mg/kg) and group of blank model. The drug was given once daily for 20 d continuously, and normal saline was used as control. The blood was drawn from the posterior tibial vein of all ducks before treatment (T0), after the medication for 5 (T5), 10 (T10), 15 (T15), 20 (T20) d and withdrawl of the drug for 3 d (P3). The serum samples were separated and stored at -70 °C, DHBV-DNA was detected by the dot-blot hybridization.RESULTS: After addition of Lip-M and matrine to 2.2.15 cell line for eleven d, the median toxic concentration (TC50) of Lip-M and matrine was 7.29 mg/mL and 1.33 mg/mL respectively. The median concentration (IC50) of Lip-M to inhibit HBsAg and HBeAg expression was 0.078 mg/mL and 3.35 mg/mL respectively. The treatment index (TI) value of Lip-M for HBsAg and HBeAg was 93.46 and 2.17 respectively, better than that of matrine. The DHBV-infected duck model treatment test showed that the duck serum DHBV-DNA levels were markedly reduced in the group of Lip-M (20 mg/kg) after treated by gastric perfusion for 10, 15 and 20 d (0.43±0.22 vs 0.95±0.18, t = 4.70, P = 0.001<0.01.0.40±0.12 vs 0.95±0.18, t = 6.34, P = 0.000<0.01. 0.22±0.10 vs 0.95±0.18, t = 8.30, P = 0.000<0.01), compared to the group of matrine (20 mg/kg) (0.43±0.22 vs 0.79±0.19, t = 3.17, P = 0.01<0.05. 0.40±0.12 vs 0.73±0.24, t = 3.21, P = 0.009<0.05. 0.22±0.10 vs 0.55±0.32, t = 2.27, P = 0.046<0.05.), and the control(0.43±0.22 vs 0.98±0.29, t = 3.68, P = 0.005<0.01. 0.40±0.12 vs 0.97±0.30, t = 4.26, P = 0.002<0.01. 0.22±0.10 vs 0.95±0.27, t = 5.76, P = 0.000<0.01). After the treatment for 20 d and withdrawl of the drug for 3 d, duck serum DHBV-DNA level in the group of Lip-M (10 mg/kg) markedly reduced (0.56±0.26 vs 0.95±0.38, t = 5.26, P = 0.003<0.05. 0.55±0.25 vs 0.95±0.38, t = 5.52, P = 0.003<0.05), and the difference was significant as compared with the control (0.56±0.26 vs 0.95±0.27, t = 2.37, P = 0.042<0.05. 0.55±0.25 vs 0.89±0.18, t = 2.55, P = 0.031<0.05), but not significant as compared with the group of matrine (20 mg/kg). After withdrawl of the drug for 3 d, the levels of DHBV-DNA did not relapse in both groups of Lip-M.
机译:目的:研究脂质体包裹的苦参碱(Lip-M)在体内外的抗HBV作用。方法:体外培养2.2.15细胞系,观察Lip-M和苦参碱对脂质体分泌的影响。 HBsAg和HBeAg。 MTT法还研究了Lip-M和苦参碱对2.2.15细胞的毒性。在体内研究中,在鸭被鸭乙型肝炎病毒(DHBV)感染后第13天进行了药物治疗实验。将鸭子随机分为4组,每组5-6只鸭子。分别通过胃灌流对DHBV感染的鸭子给予Lip-M和苦参碱。观察四组:Lip-M组(20mg / kg),Lip-M组(10mg / kg),苦参碱组(20mg / kg)和空白模型组。每天连续给药20 d,每天一次,以生理盐水为对照。在治疗前(T0),用药5(T5),10(T10),15(T15),20(T20)d并撤药3 d后,从所有鸭子的胫后静脉采血。 (P3)。分离血清,于-70°C保存,斑点杂交检测DHBV-DNA。结果:在2.2.15细胞系中加入Lip-M和苦参碱达11 d后,中毒浓度( Lip-M和苦参碱的TC50)分别为7.29 mg / mL和1.33 mg / mL。抑制HBsAg和HBeAg表达的Lip-M的中位浓度(IC50)分别为0.078 mg / mL和3.35 mg / mL。 Lip-M对HBsAg和HBeAg的治疗指数(TI)值分别为93.46和2.17,优于苦参碱。 DHBV感染的鸭模型治疗试验显示,在通过胃灌注10、15和20 d后,Lip-M组(20 mg / kg)的鸭血清DHBV-DNA水平显着降低(0.43±0.22 vs 0.95±0.18,t = 4.70,P = 0.001 <0.01.0.40±0.12 vs 0.95±0.18,t = 6.34,P = 0.000 <0.01。0.22±0.10 vs 0.95±0.18,t = 8.30,P = 0.000 <0.01) ,与苦参碱(20 mg / kg)组相比(0.43±0.22 vs 0.79±0.19,t = 3.17,P = 0.01 <0.05。0.40±0.12 vs 0.73±0.24, t = 3.21, P = 0.009 <0.05。0.22±0.10 vs 0.55±0.32, t = 2.27, P = 0.046 <0.05。),而对照(0.43±0.22 vs 0.98±0.29, t = 3.68, P = 0.005 <0.01。0.40±0.12 vs 0.97±0.30, t = 4.26, P = 0.002 <0.01。0.22±0.10 vs。 0.95±0.27, t = 5.76, P = 0.000 <0.01)。治疗20 d后停药3 d,Lip-M组鸭血清DHBV-DNA水平(10 mg / kg)显着降低(0.56±0.26 vs 0.95±) 0.38, t = 5.26, P = 0.003 <0.05。0.55±0.25 vs 0.95±0.38, t = 5.52, P = 0.003 <0.05),与对照组相比差异显着(0.56±0.26 vs 0.95±0.27, t = 2.37, P = 0.042 <0.05。0.55±0.25 vs 0.89±0.18, t = 2.55, P = 0.031 <0.05),但与苦参碱组(20 mg / kg)相比不显着。撤药3天后,两组Lip-M的DHBV-DNA水平均未复发。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号