首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Veterinary Sciences >Comparing Item Performance on Three- Versus Four-Option Multiple Choice Questions in a Veterinary Toxicology Course
【2h】

Comparing Item Performance on Three- Versus Four-Option Multiple Choice Questions in a Veterinary Toxicology Course

机译:兽医毒理学课程中三对四选项多项选择题的项目绩效比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Background: The number of answer options is an important element of multiple-choice questions (MCQs). Many MCQs contain four or more options despite the limited literature suggesting that there is little to no benefit beyond three options. The purpose of this study was to evaluate item performance on 3-option versus 4-option MCQs used in a core curriculum course in veterinary toxicology at a large veterinary medical school in the United States. Methods: A quasi-experimental, crossover design was used in which students in each class were randomly assigned to take one of two versions (A or B) of two major exams. Results: Both the 3-option and 4-option MCQs resulted in similar psychometric properties. Conclusion: The findings of our study support earlier research in other medical disciplines and settings that likewise concluded there was no significant change in the psychometric properties of three option MCQs when compared to the traditional MCQs with four or more options.
机译:背景:答案选项的数量是多项选择题(MCQ)的重要组成部分。尽管文献有限,许多MCQ包含四个或更多选项,但只有三个选项几乎没有益处。这项研究的目的是评估在美国一家大型兽医医学院的兽医毒理学核心课程中使用的三选项与四选项MCQ的项目性能。方法:采用准实验的交叉设计,每个班级的学生被随机分配参加两个主要考试的两个版本(A或B)之一。结果:3选项和4选项MCQ都具有相似的心理计量特性。结论:我们的研究结果支持了其他医学学科和环境中的早期研究,这些研究同样得出结论,与具有四个或更多选项的传统MCQ相比,三个选项MCQ的心理测量特性没有显着变化。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号