首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Zhejiang University. Science. B >Transumbilical single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy using traditional laparoscopic instruments: a report of thirty-six cases
【2h】

Transumbilical single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy using traditional laparoscopic instruments: a report of thirty-six cases

机译:传统腹腔镜器械经脐带单口腹腔镜胆囊切除术三十六例报告

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Objective: To evaluate the feasibility and safety of the operation of transumbilical single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy (TSPLC) by traditional laparoscopic instruments and summarize the initial experience. Methods: Sixty subjects with cholelithiasis were divided into two groups. One group (36 cases) underwent TSPLC and the control group (24 cases) underwent traditional three-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). Postoperative complications were observed and operation time, hospital days, visual analogue scale (VAS) after 6 and 24 h of operation, and subject satisfaction score were measured. Results: TSPLC and traditional LC were performed successfully in the two groups. The operation time in the TSPLC group was significantly longer than that in the control group. There was no statistically significant difference in hospital stay and VAS between the TSPLC and control groups. The subject satisfaction score in the TSPLC group was 91.2, significantly higher than that in the control group (P<0.01). All subjects recovered from the operation and no postoperative complication occurred during the period of two weeks after operation. Conclusions: TSPLC is a feasible and safe method for cholecystectomy, although it may be more time-consuming. However, it is welcomed by patients who are more concerned with cosmetic outcomes. Future studies are needed to confirm its disadvantages and contraindications.
机译:目的:评价传统腹腔镜器械行脐带单口腹腔镜胆囊切除术(TSPLC)的可行性和安全性,并总结初步经验。方法:将60名胆石症患者分为两组。一组(36例)接受TSPLC治疗,对照组(24例)接受传统的三孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)。观察术后并发症,并测量手术时间,住院天数,手术6和24小时后的视觉模拟量表(VAS)以及受试者满意度得分。结果:两组均成功进行了TSPLC和传统LC。 TSPLC组的手术时间明显长于对照组。 TSPLC和对照组之间的住院时间和VAS差异无统计学意义。 TSPLC组的受试者满意度得分为91.2,明显高于对照组(P <0.01)。所有受试者均从手术中恢复,并且在术后两周内未发生术后并发症。结论:TSPLC是一种可行且安全的胆囊切除术方法,尽管它可能更耗时。但是,它更受美容效果的患者欢迎。需要进一步的研究以确认其缺点和禁忌症。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号