首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Trends in Hearing >A Multicenter Trial of an Assess-and-Fit Hearing Aid Service Using Open Canal Fittings and Comply Ear Tips
【2h】

A Multicenter Trial of an Assess-and-Fit Hearing Aid Service Using Open Canal Fittings and Comply Ear Tips

机译:使用开放式管接头和顺应耳尖的评估和适配式助听器服务的多中心试验

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Large potential benefits have been suggested for an assess-and-fit approach to hearing health care, particularly using open canal fittings. However, the clinical effectiveness has not previously been evaluated, nor has the efficiency of this approach in a National Health Service setting. These two outcomes were measured in a variety of clinical settings in the United Kingdom. Twelve services in England and Wales participated, and 540 people with hearing problems, not previously referred for assessment, were included. Of these, 68% (n = 369) were suitable and had hearing aids fitted to NAL NL1 during the assess-and-fit visit using either open ear tips, or Comply ear tips. The Glasgow Hearing Aid Benefit Profile was used to compare patients fitted with open ear tips with a group of patients from the English Modernization of Hearing Aid Services evaluation, who used custom earmolds. This showed a significant improvement in outcome for those with open ear tips after allowing for age and hearing loss in the analysis. In particular, the benefits of using bilateral open ear tips were significantly larger than bilateral custom ear-molds. This assess-and-fit model showed a mean service efficiency gain of about 5% to 10%. The actual gain will depend on current practice, in particular on the separate appointments used, the numbers of patients failing to attend appointments, and the numbers not accepting a hearing aid solution for their problem. There are potentially further efficiency and quality gains to be made if patients are appropriately triaged before referral.
机译:对于听觉保健的评估和拟合方法,尤其是使用开放式运河配件,已经提出了巨大的潜在好处。但是,以前尚未评估临床有效性,在国家卫生服务机构中也未评估这种方法的有效性。在英国的各种临床环境中对这两个结果进行了测量。英格兰和威尔士的十二个服务机构参加了该计划,其中包括540名听力障碍的人,以前没有进行评估。其中68%(n = 369)合适,并且在评估和探访期间使用开放式耳塞或Comply耳塞将助听器安装在NAL NL1上。格拉斯哥助听器福利概况用于将配备开放式耳塞的患者与使用定制耳模的英国助听器现代化评估中的一组患者进行比较。在分析中考虑了年龄和听力损失后,这表明对于那些耳尖张开的患者,其结局有明显改善。特别是,使用双边开放式耳塞的好处明显大于双边定制耳模的好处。该评估与拟合模型显示平均服务效率提高了约5%至10%。实际收益将取决于当前的做法,尤其取决于所使用的单独约会,未能参加约会的患者人数以及不接受助听器解决其问题的人数。如果在转诊之前对患者进行适当的分类,则可能会进一步提高效率和质量。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号