首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Therapeutic Advances in Hematology >Recent developments in the management of invasive fungal infections in patients with oncohematological diseases
【2h】

Recent developments in the management of invasive fungal infections in patients with oncohematological diseases

机译:肿瘤血液学疾病患者侵袭性真菌感染管理的最新进展

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Patients with hematological cancer have a high risk of invasive fungal diseases (IFDs). These infections are mostly life threatening and an early diagnosis and initiation of appropriate antifungal therapy are essential for the clinical outcome. Most commonly, Aspergillus and Candida species are involved. However, other non-Aspergillus molds are increasingly be identified in cases of documented IFDs. Important risk factors are long lasting granulocytopenia with neutrophil counts below 500/μl for more than 10 days or graft-versus-host disease resulting from allogeneic stem-cell transplantation. For definite diagnosis of IFD, various diagnostic tools have to be applied, including conventional mycological culture and nonconventional microbiological tests such as antibody/antigen and molecular tests, as well as histopathology and radiology. In the last few years, various laboratory methods, like the Aspergillus GM immunoassay (Aspergillus GM EIA), 1,3-ß-D-glucan (BG) assay or polymerase chain reaction (PCR) techniques have been developed for better diagnosis. Since no single indirect test, including radiological methods, provides the definite diagnosis of an invasive fungal infection, the combination of different diagnostic procedures, which include microbiological cultures, histological, serological and molecular methods like PCR together with the pattern of clinical presentation, may currently be the best strategy for the prompt diagnosis, initiation and monitoring of IFDs. Early start of antifungal therapy is mandatory, but clinical diagnostics often do not provide clear evidence of IFD. Integrated care pathways have been proposed for management and therapy of IFDs with either the diagnostic driven strategy using the preemptive antifungal therapy as opposed to the clinical or empirical driven strategy using the ‘traditional’ empirical antifungal therapy. Antifungal agents preferentially used for systemic therapy of invasive fungal infections are amphotericin B preparations, fluconazole, voriconazole, posaconazole, caspofungin, anidulafungin, micafungin, and most recently isavuconazole. Clinical decision making must consider licensing status, local experience and availability, pharmacological and economic aspects.
机译:血液系统癌症患者罹患浸润性真菌病(IFD)的风险很高。这些感染主要威胁生命,因此,早期诊断和开始适当的抗真菌治疗对于临床结果至关重要。最常见的是涉及曲霉和念珠菌。但是,在有记载的IFD的情况下,越来越多地发现了其他非曲霉霉菌。重要的危险因素是嗜中性粒细胞计数低于500 /μl的粒细胞减少症持续时间超过10天,或者是同种异体干细胞移植导致的移植物抗宿主病。为了明确诊断IFD,必须使用各种诊断工具,包括常规的真菌培养和非常规的微生物学检测,例如抗体/抗原和分子检测,以及组织病理学和放射学。在过去的几年中,已经开发出各种实验室方法,例如曲霉菌GM免疫测定法(Aspergillus GM EIA),1,3-ß-D-葡聚糖(BG)测定法或聚合酶链反应(PCR)技术,以便更好地诊断。由于没有单一的间接测试(包括放射学方法)能够明确诊断出侵袭性真菌感染,因此目前可能会结合使用各种不同的诊断程序,包括微生物培养,组织学,血清学和分子生物学方法(如PCR)以及临床表现形式迅速诊断,启动和监测IFD的最佳策略。必须尽早开始抗真菌治疗,但是临床诊断通常不能提供IFD的明确证据。已经提出了采用先发性抗真菌治疗的诊断驱动策略而非采用“传统”经验抗真菌治疗的临床或经验驱动策略来对IFD进行管理和治疗的综合护理途径。优先用于侵袭性真菌感染的全身治疗的抗真菌药是两性霉素B制剂,氟康唑,伏立康唑,泊沙康唑,卡泊芬净,阿尼芬净,米卡芬净,最近使用的是伊沙康康唑。临床决策必须考虑许可状态,本地经验和可用性,药理和经济方面。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号