首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Systematic Reviews >Considering methodological options for reviews of theory: illustrated by a review of theories linking income and health
【2h】

Considering methodological options for reviews of theory: illustrated by a review of theories linking income and health

机译:考虑理论审查的方法选择:以收入与健康相关的理论审查为例

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

BackgroundReview of theory is an area of growing methodological advancement. Theoretical reviews are particularly useful where the literature is complex, multi-discipline, or contested. It has been suggested that adopting methods from systematic reviews may help address these challenges. However, the methodological approaches to reviews of theory, including the degree to which systematic review methods can be incorporated, have received little discussion in the literature. We recently employed systematic review methods in a review of theories about the causal relationship between income and health.
机译:背景理论的审查是方法学发展的一个领域。在文学内容复杂,跨学科或有争议的地方,理论评论特别有用。有人建议采用系统评价的方法可能有助于解决这些挑战。然而,文献综述很少涉及理论综述的方法论方法,包括可以纳入系统评价方法的程度。我们最近在回顾有关收入与健康之间因果关系的理论时采用了系统的综述方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号