首页> 外文会议>Scandinavian information systems research >An Analysis of Literature Reviews on IS Business Value: How Deficiencies in Methodology and Theory Use Resulted in Limited Effectiveness
【24h】

An Analysis of Literature Reviews on IS Business Value: How Deficiencies in Methodology and Theory Use Resulted in Limited Effectiveness

机译:对IS业务价值的文献综述分析:方法论和理论运用的不足如何导致有限的有效性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Enduring doubts about the value of IS investments reveal that IS researchers have not fully managed to identify and to explain the economic benefits of IS. This paper assumes that literature reviews, which represent a powerful instrument for the identification and synthesis of knowledge, have not tapped their full potential to address this issue due to deficiencies in methodology. The analysis of 18 literature reviews published in pertinent academic outlets during the past 20 years shows such deficiencies. Two of the most critical weaknesses identified are (1) the lack of theory use in most reviews and (2) a weak linkage of reviews, resulting in little progress in theory and framework development. The systematic identification of these weaknesses and the extraction of promising methodological examples from past literature are the main contributions of this work, which supports the composition of more effective literature reviews in future research.
机译:对信息系统投资价值的持久怀疑表明,信息系统研究人员尚未完全设法确定和解释信息系统的经济利益。本文假设文献综述代表了知识的识别和综合的有力工具,但由于方法论的不足,并未充分发挥其潜力来解决这一问题。对过去20年间在相关学术机构发表的18篇文献评论的分析表明了这种缺陷。确定的两个最关键的弱点是:(1)大多数评论中缺乏理论使用;(2)评论之间的联系较弱,导致理论和框架开发方面的进展甚微。对这些弱点的系统性识别以及从过去的文献中提取有希望的方法论实例是这项工作的主要贡献,这为将来研究中更有效的文献综述的构成提供了支持。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号