首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Sensors (Basel Switzerland) >Survey on the Performance of Source Localization Algorithms
【2h】

Survey on the Performance of Source Localization Algorithms

机译:源定位算法性能调查

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The localization of emitters using an array of sensors or antennas is a prevalent issue approached in several applications. There exist different techniques for source localization, which can be classified into multilateration, received signal strength (RSS) and proximity methods. The performance of multilateration techniques relies on measured time variables: the time of flight (ToF) of the emission from the emitter to the sensor, the time differences of arrival (TDoA) of the emission between sensors and the pseudo-time of flight (pToF) of the emission to the sensors. The multilateration algorithms presented and compared in this paper can be classified as iterative and non-iterative methods. Both standard least squares (SLS) and hyperbolic least squares (HLS) are iterative and based on the Newton–Raphson technique to solve the non-linear equation system. The metaheuristic technique particle swarm optimization (PSO) used for source localisation is also studied. This optimization technique estimates the source position as the optimum of an objective function based on HLS and is also iterative in nature. Three non-iterative algorithms, namely the hyperbolic positioning algorithms (HPA), the maximum likelihood estimator (MLE) and Bancroft algorithm, are also presented. A non-iterative combined algorithm, MLE-HLS, based on MLE and HLS, is further proposed in this paper. The performance of all algorithms is analysed and compared in terms of accuracy in the localization of the position of the emitter and in terms of computational time. The analysis is also undertaken with three different sensor layouts since the positions of the sensors affect the localization; several source positions are also evaluated to make the comparison more robust. The analysis is carried out using theoretical time differences, as well as including errors due to the effect of digital sampling of the time variables. It is shown that the most balanced algorithm, yielding better results than the other algorithms in terms of accuracy and short computational time, is the combined MLE-HLS algorithm.
机译:使用传感器或天线阵列对发射器进行定位是一些应用中普遍存在的问题。存在多种用于源定位的技术,这些技术可以分为多边定位,接收信号强度(RSS)和邻近方法。多边技术的性能取决于测得的时间变量:从发射器到传感器的发射的飞行时间(ToF),传感器之间的发射到达时间差(TDoA)和伪飞行时间(pToF) )发射到传感器。本文提出和比较的多纬度算法可以分为迭代法和非迭代法。标准最小二乘(SLS)和双曲最小二乘(HLS)都是迭代的,并且基于牛顿-拉夫森技术来求解非线性方程组。还研究了用于源定位的元启发式技术粒子群算法(PSO)。这种优化技术基于HLS将源位置估计为目标函数的最佳值,并且本质上也是迭代的。还提出了三种非迭代算法,即双曲定位算法(HPA),最大似然估计器(MLE)和Bancroft算法。本文还提出了一种基于MLE和HLS的非迭代组合算法MLE-HLS。分析所有算法的性能,并根据发射器位置的定位精度和计算时间进行比较。由于传感器的位置会影响定位,因此还可以使用三种不同的传感器布局进行分析。还评估了多个源位置,以使比较更加可靠。使用理论时间差进行分析,并包括由于时间变量的数字采样而导致的误差。结果表明,结合MLE-HLS算法,最平衡的算法在准确性和计算时间方面均比其他算法产生更好的结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号