首页> 外文期刊>Brain topography >Evaluation of algorithms for intracranial EEG (iEEG) source imaging of extended sources: feasibility of using iEEG source imaging for localizing epileptogenic zones in secondary generalized epilepsy.
【24h】

Evaluation of algorithms for intracranial EEG (iEEG) source imaging of extended sources: feasibility of using iEEG source imaging for localizing epileptogenic zones in secondary generalized epilepsy.

机译:扩展源颅内脑电图(iEEG)源成像算法的评估:使用iEEG源成像在继发性全身性癫痫中定位癫痫发生区的可行性。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Precise identification of epileptogenic zones in patients with intractable drug-resistant epilepsy is critical for successful epilepsy surgery. Numerous source-imaging algorithms for localizing epileptogenic zones based on scalp electroencephalography (EEG) and magnetoencephalography (MEG) have been developed and validated in simulation and experimental studies. Recently, intracranial EEG (iEEG)-based imaging of epileptogenic sources has attracted interest as a promising tool for presurgical evaluation of epilepsy; however, most iEEG studies have focused on localization of epileptogenic zones in focal epilepsy. In the present study, we investigated whether iEEG source imaging is a useful supplementary tool for identifying extended epileptogenic sources in secondary generalized epilepsy such as Lennox-Gastaut syndrome (LGS). To this end, we applied four different cortical source imaging algorithms, namely minimum norm estimation (MNE), low-resolution electromagnetic tomography (LORETA), standardized LORETA (sLORETA), and L(p)-norm estimation (p = 1.5, referred to as Lp1.5), to artificial iEEG datasets generated assuming various source sizes and locations. We also applied these four algorithms to clinical ictal iEEG recordings acquired from a pediatric patient with LGS. Interestingly, the traditional MNE algorithm outperformed the other imaging algorithms in most of our experiments, particularly in cases when larger-sized sources were activated. Although sLORETA outperformed both LORETA and Lp1.5, its performance was not as good as that of MNE. Compared to the other algorithms, the performance of Lp1.5 decayed most rapidly as the source size increased. Our findings suggest that iEEG source imaging using MNE is a promising auxiliary tool for the identification of epileptogenic zones in secondary generalized epilepsy. We anticipate that our results will provide useful guidelines for selection of an appropriate imaging algorithm for iEEG source imaging studies.
机译:难治性耐药性癫痫患者中准确识别癫痫发生区对于成功进行癫痫手术至关重要。已经开发了多种基于头皮脑电图(EEG)和磁脑电图(MEG)定位癫痫发生区的源成像算法,并在仿真和实验研究中进行了验证。最近,基于颅内脑电图(iEEG)的癫痫源成像已引起人们的兴趣,作为对癫痫进行术前评估的有前途的工具。然而,大多数iEEG研究集中在局灶性癫痫中癫痫发生区的定位。在本研究中,我们调查了iEEG源成像是否是用于识别继发性广义癫痫(如Lennox-Gastaut综合征(LGS))中扩展的癫痫源的有用补充工具。为此,我们应用了四种不同的皮质源成像算法,即最小范数估计(MNE),低分辨率电磁层析成像(LORETA),标准化LORETA(sLORETA)和L(p)-范数估计(p = 1.5,参考到Lp1.5),以假设各种来源大小和位置生成的人工iEEG数据集。我们还将这四种算法应用于从LGS儿科患者获得的临床ital记录。有趣的是,在我们的大多数实验中,传统的MNE算法都优于其他成像算法,尤其是在激活较大尺寸的信号源的情况下。尽管sLORETA优于LORETA和Lp1.5,但其性能不如MNE。与其他算法相比,随着源大小的增加,Lp1.5的性能衰减最快。我们的发现表明,使用MNE的iEEG源成像是用于识别继发性全身性癫痫中癫痫发生区的有前途的辅助工具。我们预期我们的结果将为选择合适的成像算法进行iEEG源成像研究提供有用的指导。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号