首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Sensors (Basel Switzerland) >Experimental Energy Consumption of Frame Slotted ALOHA and Distributed Queuing for Data Collection Scenarios
【2h】

Experimental Energy Consumption of Frame Slotted ALOHA and Distributed Queuing for Data Collection Scenarios

机译:帧时隙ALOHA和数据队列的分布式排队的实验能耗

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Data collection is a key scenario for the Internet of Things because it enables gathering sensor data from distributed nodes that use low-power and long-range wireless technologies to communicate in a single-hop approach. In this kind of scenario, the network is composed of one coordinator that covers a particular area and a large number of nodes, typically hundreds or thousands, that transmit data to the coordinator upon request. Considering this scenario, in this paper we experimentally validate the energy consumption of two Medium Access Control (MAC) protocols, Frame Slotted ALOHA (FSA) and Distributed Queuing (DQ). We model both protocols as a state machine and conduct experiments to measure the average energy consumption in each state and the average number of times that a node has to be in each state in order to transmit a data packet to the coordinator. The results show that FSA is more energy efficient than DQ if the number of nodes is known a priori because the number of slots per frame can be adjusted accordingly. However, in such scenarios the number of nodes cannot be easily anticipated, leading to additional packet collisions and a higher energy consumption due to retransmissions. Contrarily, DQ does not require to know the number of nodes in advance because it is able to efficiently construct an ad hoc network schedule for each collection round. This kind of a schedule ensures that there are no packet collisions during data transmission, thus leading to an energy consumption reduction above 10% compared to FSA.
机译:数据收集是物联网的关键场景,因为它可以从分布式节点收集传感器数据,这些分布式节点使用低功率和远程无线技术以单跳方式进行通信。在这种情况下,网络由一个覆盖特定区域的协调器和大量节点(通常是数百个或数千个)组成,这些节点根据请求将数据传输到协调器。考虑到这种情况,在本文中我们通过实验验证了两种媒体访问控制(MAC)协议(帧时隙ALOHA(FSA)和分布式队列(DQ))的能耗。我们将这两种协议都建模为状态机,并进行实验以测量每种状态下的平均能耗以及节点必须处于每种状态下才能将数据包传输到协调器的平均次数。结果表明,如果先验地知道节点数,则FSA比DQ更节能,因为可以相应地调整每帧的时隙数。但是,在这种情况下,节点的数量无法轻易预测,由于重传,导致额外的数据包冲突和更高的能耗。相反,DQ不需要事先知道节点数,因为它能够为每个收集回合有效地构建临时网络计划。这种时间表可确保在数据传输期间不会发生数据包冲突,因此与FSA相比,能耗降低了10%以上。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号