首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Schizophrenia Bulletin >Social Cognition Psychometric Evaluation: Results of the Initial Psychometric Study
【2h】

Social Cognition Psychometric Evaluation: Results of the Initial Psychometric Study

机译:社会认知心理测评:初步心理测验结果

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Measurement of social cognition in treatment trials remains problematic due to poor and limited psychometric data for many tasks. As part of the Social Cognition Psychometric Evaluation (SCOPE) study, the psychometric properties of 8 tasks were assessed. One hundred and seventy-nine stable outpatients with schizophrenia and 104 healthy controls completed the battery at baseline and a 2–4-week retest period at 2 sites. Tasks included the Ambiguous Intentions Hostility Questionnaire (AIHQ), Bell Lysaker Emotion Recognition Task (BLERT), Penn Emotion Recognition Task (ER-40), Relationships Across Domains (RAD), Reading the Mind in the Eyes Task (Eyes), The Awareness of Social Inferences Test (TASIT), Hinting Task, and Trustworthiness Task. Tasks were evaluated on: (i) test-retest reliability, (ii) utility as a repeated measure, (iii) relationship to functional outcome, (iv) practicality and tolerability, (v) sensitivity to group differences, and (vi) internal consistency. The BLERT and Hinting task showed the strongest psychometric properties across all evaluation criteria and are recommended for use in clinical trials. The ER-40, Eyes Task, and TASIT showed somewhat weaker psychometric properties and require further study. The AIHQ, RAD, and Trustworthiness Task showed poorer psychometric properties that suggest caution for their use in clinical trials.
机译:由于许多任务的心理测量数据差且有限,因此在治疗试验中对社会认知的测量仍然存在问题。作为社会认知心理测评(SCOPE)研究的一部分,对8个任务的心理测评特性进行了评估。 179名稳定的精神分裂症门诊患者和104名健康对照者在基线时完成了电池,并在2个地点完成了2–4周的重新测试。任务包括歧义意图敌意调查表(AIHQ),贝尔Lysaker情感识别任务(BLERT),宾夕法尼亚州情感识别任务(ER-40),跨域关系(RAD),阅读心灵的任务(眼睛),意识推理测试(TASIT),提示任务和可信赖性任务。在以下方面评估了任务:(i)重测信度,(ii)作为重复测量的效用,(iii)与功能结果的关系,(iv)实用性和耐受性,(v)对小组差异的敏感性,以及(vi)内部一致性。在所有评估标准中,BLERT和Hinting任务均显示出最强的心理测量特性,建议在临床试验中使用。 ER-40,Eyes Task和TASIT的心理测量性能较弱,需要进一步研究。 AIHQ,RAD和“可信赖性任务”显示出较差的心理测量特性,这提示在临床试验中应谨慎使用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号