首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Respiratory Research >Withdrawal of inhaled corticosteroids in individuals with COPD - a systematic review and comment on trial methodology
【2h】

Withdrawal of inhaled corticosteroids in individuals with COPD - a systematic review and comment on trial methodology

机译:患有COPD的个体中吸入皮质类固醇的戒断-系统评价和对试验方法的评论

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) reduce COPD exacerbation frequency and slow decline in health related quality of life but have little effect on lung function, do not reduce mortality, and increase the risk of pneumonia. We systematically reviewed trials in which ICS have been withdrawn from patients with COPD, with the aim of determining the effect of withdrawal, understanding the differing results between trials, and making recommendations for improving methodology in future trials where medication is withdrawn. Trials were identified by two independent reviewers using MEDLINE, EMBASE and CINAHL, citations of identified studies were checked, and experts contacted to identify further studies. Data extraction was completed independently by two reviewers. The methodological quality of each trial was determined by assessing possible sources of systematic bias as recommended by the Cochrane collaboration. We included four trials; the quality of three was adequate. In all trials, outcomes were generally worse for patients who had had ICS withdrawn, but differences between outcomes for these patients and patients who continued with medication were mostly small and not statistically significant. Due to data paucity we performed only one meta-analysis; this indicated that patients who had had medication withdrawn were 1.11 (95% CI 0.84 to 1.46) times more likely to have an exacerbation in the following year, but the definition of exacerbations was not consistent between the three trials, and the impact of withdrawal was smaller in recent trials which were also trials conducted under conditions that reflected routine practice. There is no evidence from this review that withdrawing ICS in routine practice results in important deterioration in patient outcomes. Furthermore, the extent of increase in exacerbations depends on the way exacerbations are defined and managed and may depend on the use of other medication. In trials where medication is withdrawn, investigators should report other medication use, definitions of exacerbations and management of patients clearly. Intention to treat analyses should be used and interpreted appropriately.
机译:吸入皮质类固醇(ICS)可以降低COPD恶化的频率并减缓与健康相关的生活质量的下降,但对肺功能影响不大,不会降低死亡率,并增加了患肺炎的风险。我们系统地回顾了已从COPD患者中撤出ICS的试验,旨在确定撤药的效果,了解两次试验之间的不同结果,并提出建议以改进将来撤药的试验方法。由两名独立的审阅者使用MEDLINE,EMBASE和CINAHL鉴定试验,检查鉴定出的研究的引文,并联系专家以鉴定进一步的研究。数据提取由两名审阅者独立完成。通过评估Cochrane合作建议的系统偏倚的可能来源,确定每个试验的方法学质量。我们纳入了四项试验;三个的质量是足够的。在所有试验中,ICS撤回的患者的结局通常较差,但这些患者与继续用药的患者的结局之间的差异主要很小,且无统计学意义。由于数据匮乏,我们只进行了一项荟萃分析;这表明已停药的患者次年加重病情的可能性高1.11倍(95%CI 0.84至1.46)倍,但三项试验之间加重的定义不一致,并且停药的影响是在最近的试验中较小,这也是在反映常规操作的条件下进行的试验。该评价没有证据表明常规实践中停用ICS会导致患者预后严重恶化。此外,加重的程度取决于加重的定义和控制方式,并可能取决于其他药物的使用。在撤回药物的试验中,研究者应报告其他药物的使用,病情加重的定义和患者的治疗。应该使用治疗分析的意图并进行适当的解释。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号