首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Research Involvement and Engagement >Stakeholder involvement in health research priority setting in low income countries: the case of Zambia
【2h】

Stakeholder involvement in health research priority setting in low income countries: the case of Zambia

机译:利益相关者参与低收入国家卫生研究优先重点的确定:赞比亚的情况

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

SummaryWhile there is increasing recognition of the importance of stakeholder involvement in health research priority setting there is a paucity of literature reporting on stakeholder involvement in health research priority setting in low income countries. This paper fills this gap by identifying and discussing the roles and legitimacy of different stakeholders (including the public and patients) involved in the health research priority setting process in Zambia; identifying the barriers to public participation and proposing improvement strategies.We interviewed 28 policy makers and practitioners who had participated in the national level health research priority setting in Zambia. Reported participants in health research priority setting included research users, researchers, research funders and the community/ public. Research funders were thought to have undue influence while the public and patients were not effectively involved. This could be due to the public’s lack of education, lack of resources to facilitate public involvement and limited skills to meaningfully engage the public. Participation of people from rural areas, women and young professionals was also limited.While there is a commitment to broad stakeholder involvement in health research priority setting, there’s limited public/patient involvement. Public education, availing more resources, and skills to meaningfully engage the public need to be explored. The undue influence of research funders should be mitigated and incentives availed to ensure that they align their research funding with the national priorities. These efforts would strengthen meaningful stakeholder engagement in health research prioritization within Zambia and other similar contexts.
机译:总结尽管越来越多地认识到利益相关者参与健康研究优先重点设置的重要性,但在低收入国家中,很少有文献报道利益相关者参与健康研究优先重点设置。本文通过确定和讨论参与赞比亚卫生研究优先重点确定过程的不同利益相关者(包括公众和患者)的作用和合法性,填补了这一空白;确定阻碍公众参与的障碍并提出改进策略。我们采访了28位参与了赞比亚国家级卫生研究重点设定的决策者和从业人员。参与卫生研究优先重点确定的报告参与者包括研究用户,研究人员,研究资助者和社区/公众。人们认为研究资助者的影响不当,而公众和患者并未得到有效参与。这可能是由于公众缺乏教育,缺乏促进公众参与的资源以及有效地吸引公众参与的技能有限。来自农村地区的人们,妇女和年轻专业人员的参与也受到限制。尽管致力于使利益相关者广泛参与健康研究优先领域的确定,但公共/患者的参与却有限。需要探索公共教育,利用更多的资源和有效地吸引公众的技巧。应该减轻研究资助者的不当影响,并采取激励措施,以确保他们将研究资助与国家优先事项保持一致。这些努力将加强利益相关者在赞比亚和其他类似情况下参与卫生研究优先次序的有意义的参与。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号