首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Research Involvement and Engagement >Exploring the impact of providing evidence-based medicine training to service users
【2h】

Exploring the impact of providing evidence-based medicine training to service users

机译:探索为服务使用者提供循证医学培训的影响

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Plain English summaryWithin health services research in the UK, there has been growing interest in evidence-based medicine (EBM) and patient and public involvement (PPI) in research. These two movements have a common goal of improving the quality and transparency of clinical decision making. So far, there has been relatively little discussion about how these two movements might relate to each other, despite their common concern. Indeed, some in the PPI movement have expressed doubts about the implications of EBM for PPI because they worry that its emphasis on evidence from clinical trials marginalises the importance of a patient’s individual experiences in clinical decision making. The purpose of this paper is to examine the potential for EBM and PPI to complement one another.We analysed the feedback of 10 members of the Peninsula Public Involvement Group (PenPIG) who attended EBM workshops. These workshops trained people in the basics of EBM and were primarily attended by health professionals. We used thematic analysis, a qualitative data analysis method, to explore the responses. We found that participation in the workshops appears to have increased the ability and confidence of members of the public to actively participate as both producers and consumers of research evidence. We conclude that there is an untapped potential for EBM and PPI to complement one another in their shared desire to improve the quality and transparency of clinical decision making.
机译:简单的英语摘要在英国的卫生服务研究中,人们越来越对基于证据的医学(EBM)和患者及公众参与(PPI)的研究产生兴趣。这两个运动的共同目标是提高临床决策的质量和透明度。到目前为止,尽管存在着共同的关注,但关于这两个运动如何相互联系的讨论还很少。的确,PPI运动中的一些人对EBM对PPI的意义表示怀疑,因为他们担心EBM对临床试验证据的重视边缘化了患者个人经验在临床决策中的重要性。本文的目的是检验EBM和PPI相互补充的潜力。我们分析了参加EBM研讨会的10名半岛公众参与小组(PenPIG)的反馈。这些讲习班对以循证医学为基础的人员进行了培训,主要由卫生专业人员参加。我们使用主题分析(一种定性数据分析方法)来探索响应。我们发现,参加这些研讨会似乎增强了公众作为研究证据的生产者和消费者积极参与的能力和信心。我们的结论是,EBM和PPI在提高临床决策质量和透明度的共同愿望中有互补的潜力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号