首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Renal Failure >Comparison of risk of stroke in patients treated with peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
【2h】

Comparison of risk of stroke in patients treated with peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

机译:腹膜透析和血液透析患者中​​风风险的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Objective: Accumulating evidence has demonstrated that dialysis patients are at increased risk for stroke. However, the impact of dialysis modalities on stroke risk remains controversial. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the effect of peritoneal dialysis (PD) and hemodialysis (HD) on stroke risk.>Methods: A systematic search of PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science was performed to identify articles comparing the stroke outcomes of dialysis patients. Hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were extracted and synthesized to examine stroke outcomes, including ischemic stroke, hemorrhagic stroke, and overall stroke.>Results: The search yielded five studies composed of 1,219,245 patients that were evaluated in the final analysis. The results showed that PD was associated with a lower risk for hemorrhagic stroke compared with HD (HR = 0.78; 95% CI: 0.69–0.88; p < 0.001). For ischemic stroke, the results showed that PD was associated with a higher risk compared with HD among the non-Asian patients (HR = 1.13; 95% CI: 1.05–1.23; p = 0.002), but there were no significant differences between PD and HD for the Asian patients. Similarly, there were no significant differences between the effects of the PD and HD approaches on overall stroke risk.>Conclusions: We observed that PD patients were less likely to develop hemorrhagic stroke than HD patients, and the risk for ischemic stroke was significantly higher for PD patients than for HD patients among the non-Asian patients. However, our findings could be biased due to the heterogeneity of the included studies.
机译:>目的:越来越多的证据表明,透析患者的中风风险增加。但是,透析方式对中风风险的影响仍存在争议。我们进行了系统的回顾和荟萃分析,以确定腹膜透析(PD)和血液透析(HD)对中风风险的影响。>方法:系统地搜索了PubMed,EMBASE和Web of Science为了识别比较透析患者卒中结果的文章而进行的研究。提取并合成具有95%置信区间(95%CI)的危险比(HRs),以检查卒中结果,包括缺血性卒中,出血性卒中和整体卒中。>结果:该搜索产生了五项研究在最终分析中评估的1,219,245名患者中。结果显示,与HD相比,PD与出血性中风的风险较低(HR = 0.78; 95%CI:0.69–0.88; p <0.001)。对于缺血性中风,结果显示非亚裔患者的PD与HD相比具有更高的风险(HR = 1.13; 95%CI:1.05-1.23; p = 0.002),但PD之间无显着差异和HD(亚洲患者)。同样,PD和HD方法对总体中风风险的影响之间也没有显着差异。>结论:我们观察到,PD患者比HD患者发生出血性中风的可能性更低,并且在非亚裔患者中,PD患者的缺血性中风显着高于HD患者。但是,由于纳入研究的异质性,我们的发现可能有偏差。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号