首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Innovations in Clinical Neuroscience >Efficacy and Safety of Once- versus Twice-Daily Carbamazepine Extended-Release Capsules for the Treatment of Manic Symptoms in Patients with Bipolar I Disorder
【2h】

Efficacy and Safety of Once- versus Twice-Daily Carbamazepine Extended-Release Capsules for the Treatment of Manic Symptoms in Patients with Bipolar I Disorder

机译:卡马西平一次或两次每日两次服用卡马西平缓释胶囊治疗双相性I型障碍患者躁狂症状的疗效和安全性

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Objective: To compare the efficacy and safety of carbamazepine extended-release capsules (CBZ-ERC) administered twice daily (BID) versus once daily for the treatment of manic symptoms associated with bipolar I disorder in adults.>Design: This was a Phase IIIb, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, multicenter, 12-week study. Subjects were randomized (1:1) to CBZ-ERC once daily at bedtime (QHS) or BID. Dosing was initiated at CBZ-ERC 200mg/d and titrated to achieve an optimal dose (target dose, 800mg/d; maximum dose, 1600mg/d). The primary efficacy outcome variable was the Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS). The Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression, 21-item version (HAM-D21), Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS), Clinical Global Impressions Scale–Bipolar Version (CGI-BP), and time to remission were secondary outcome variables. Safety measures included recording of adverse events, physical examination, vital signs (blood pressure, pulse rate, and weight), and clinical laboratory and electrocardiogram (ECG) parameters.>Results: BID and QHS dosing were equally effective in improving symptoms of bipolar disorder, as measured with the YMRS, HAM-D21, MADRS, and CGI-BP. Both BID and QHS dosing significantly improved total scores on the YMRS, HAM-D21, and MADRS at all time points without statistically significant differences between groups. All three components of the CGI-BP improved during the study, and a large percentage of subjects in both groups achieved remission without significant differences between groups. Both CBZ-ERC regimens appeared to be safe and well tolerated.>Conclusion: These results suggest QHS dosing may be a safe and effective alternative to BID dosing of CBZ-ERC for treating manic episodes for many adults with bipolar I disorder, although additional studies are needed to confirm this finding.
机译:>目的:比较每日两次(BID)和每日一次给予卡马西平缓释胶囊(CBZ-ERC)在成人双相性I型躁狂相关躁狂症状中的疗效和安全性。< strong>设计:这是一项IIIb期,随机,双盲,平行组,多中心,为期12周的研究。每天在就寝时间(QHS)或BID将受试者随机(1:1)分为CBZ-ERC。以200mg / d的CBZ-ERC开始给药,并进行滴定以达到最佳剂量(目标剂量800mg / d;最大剂量1600mg / d)。主要疗效结局变量为年轻躁狂症评定量表(YMRS)。汉密尔顿抑郁量表,21个项目版本(HAM-D21),蒙哥马利-奥斯伯格抑郁量表(MADRS),临床总体印象量表-双相型(CGI-BP)和缓解时间是次要结果变量。安全措施包括记录不良事件,身体检查,生命体征(血压,脉搏率和体重)以及临床实验室和心电图(ECG)参数。>结果:BID和QHS剂量同样有效使用YMRS,HAM-D21,MADRS和CGI-BP可以改善双相情感障碍的症状。 BID和QHS剂量在所有时间点均显着提高了YMRS,HAM-D21和MADRS的总分,而各组之间无统计学差异。在研究期间,CGI-BP的所有三个成分均得到改善,并且两组中的很大一部分受试者达到缓解,两组之间无显着差异。两种CBZ-ERC方案似乎都是安全且耐受性良好的。>结论:这些结果表明,QHS剂量可能是CBZ-ERC的BID剂量治疗许多双相成年人躁狂发作的安全有效替代方法我无序,尽管还需要进一步的研究来证实这一发现。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号