首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America >Focal colors across languages are representative members of color categories
【2h】

Focal colors across languages are representative members of color categories

机译:跨语言的焦点颜色是颜色类别的代表性成员

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Focal colors, or best examples of color terms, have traditionally been viewed as either the underlying source of cross-language color-naming universals or derived from category boundaries that vary widely across languages. Existing data partially support and partially challenge each of these views. Here, we advance a position that synthesizes aspects of these two traditionally opposed positions and accounts for existing data. We do so by linking this debate to more general principles. We show that best examples of named color categories across 112 languages are well-predicted from category extensions by a statistical model of how representative a sample is of a distribution, independently shown to account for patterns of human inference. This model accounts for both universal tendencies and variation in focal colors across languages. We conclude that categorization in the contested semantic domain of color may be governed by principles that apply more broadly in cognition and that these principles clarify the interplay of universal and language-specific forces in color naming.
机译:传统上,焦点颜色或颜色术语的最佳示例被视为跨语言颜色命名通用性的基础来源,或源于在不同语言中差异很大的类别边界。现有数据部分支持和部分挑战了这些视图。在这里,我们提出了一个立场,该立场综合了这两个传统上相对的立场,并说明了现有数据。为此,我们将辩论与更一般的原则联系起来。我们显示,通过一个样本样本代表性分布情况的统计模型,可以通过类别扩展很好地预测跨112种语言的命名颜色类别的最佳示例,并独立地说明了人类推断的模式。该模型考虑了通用趋势和跨语言的焦点颜色变化。我们得出结论,在有争议的色彩语义领域中的分类可能受在认知中应用更为广泛的原则的支配,并且这些原则阐明了色彩命名中通用和特定于语言的力量之间的相互作用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号