首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America >Past-focused environmental comparisons promote proenvironmental outcomes for conservatives
【2h】

Past-focused environmental comparisons promote proenvironmental outcomes for conservatives

机译:过去关注的环境比较可为保守派带来有利于环境的结果

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Conservatives appear more skeptical about climate change and global warming and less willing to act against it than liberals. We propose that this unwillingness could result from fundamental differences in conservatives’ and liberals’ temporal focus. Conservatives tend to focus more on the past than do liberals. Across six studies, we rely on this notion to demonstrate that conservatives are positively affected by past- but not by future-focused environmental comparisons. Past comparisons largely eliminated the political divide that separated liberal and conservative respondents’ attitudes toward and behavior regarding climate change, so that across these studies conservatives and liberals were nearly equally likely to fight climate change. This research demonstrates how psychological processes, such as temporal comparison, underlie the prevalent ideological gap in addressing climate change. It opens up a promising avenue to convince conservatives effectively of the need to address climate change and global warming.
机译:保守派似乎对气候变化和全球变暖持怀疑态度,与自由主义者相比,对气候变化和全球变暖的意愿更差。我们建议,这种不愿意可能是由于保守派和自由派在时间上的关注点之间的根本差异造成的。保守派比自由主义者更关注过去。在六项研究中,我们依靠这一概念来证明保守派受到过去(而不是未来)环境比较的积极影响。过去的比较在很大程度上消除了政治分歧,后者将自由派和保守派的受访者对气候变化的态度和行为分开,因此在这些研究中,保守派和自由派几乎有可能抗衡气候变化。这项研究表明,诸如时间比较之类的心理过程是如何解决气候变化中普遍存在的意识形态鸿沟的基础。它开辟了一个有希望的途径,可以使说服保守派有效地解决气候变化和全球变暖的需求。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号