首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America >Convergent and divergent effects of costimulatory molecules in conventional and regulatory CD4+ T cells
【2h】

Convergent and divergent effects of costimulatory molecules in conventional and regulatory CD4+ T cells

机译:共刺激分子在常规和调节性CD4 + T细胞中的趋同和发散作用

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Costimulatory molecules of the CD28 family on T lymphocytes integrate cues from innate immune system sensors and modulate activation responses in conventional CD4+ T cells (Tconv) and their FoxP3+ regulatory counterparts (Treg). To better understand how costimulatory and coinhibitory signals might be integrated, we profiled the changes in gene expression elicited in the hours and days after engagement of Treg and Tconv by anti-CD3 and either anti-CD28, -CTLA4, -ICOS, -PD1, -BLA, or -CD80. In Tconv, a shared “main response” was induced by CD28, ICOS, and, surprisingly, BTLA and CD80, with very limited CD28-specific (primarily Il2) or ICOS-specific elements (including Th1 and Th2 but not the follicular T signature). CTLA4 and PD1 had a very subtle impact in this system, similarly inhibiting the response to anti-CD3. Treg responded to the same costimulatory hierarchy and to the same extent as Tconv, but inducing different clusters of genes. In this reductionist system, costimulatory or coinhibitory engagement mainly elicits generic responses, suggesting that the variability of their effects in vivo result from temporal or anatomical differences in their engagement, rather than from inherently different wiring.
机译:T淋巴细胞上CD28家族的共刺激分子整合了来自先天免疫系统传感器的信号,并调节传统CD4 + T细胞(Tconv)及其FoxP3 + 调控对应物的激活反应( Treg)。为了更好地了解共刺激信号和共抑制信号如何整合,我们分析了抗CD3和抗CD28,-CTLA4,-ICOS,-PD1,Treg和Tconv参与后的数小时和数天引起的基因表达变化。 -BLA或-CD80。在Tconv中,CD28,ICOS以及令人惊讶的是BTLA和CD80诱导了共同的“主要反应”,其中CD28特异性(主要是Il2)或ICOS特异性元件(包括Th1和Th2,但滤泡性T信号非常有限) )。 CTLA4和PD1在该系统中具有非常微妙的影响,同样抑制了对抗CD3的反应。 Treg对相同的共刺激等级和Tconv的反应程度相同,但诱导了不同的基因簇。在这种还原论体系中,共刺激或共抑制性参与主要引起一般性反应,这表明它们体内作用的差异性是由于其参与的时间或解剖学差异,而不是固有地不同的接线所致。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号