首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Proceedings (Baylor University. Medical Center) >Outcomes of orthotopic heart transplantation and left ventricular assist device in patients aged 65 years or more with end-stage heart failure
【2h】

Outcomes of orthotopic heart transplantation and left ventricular assist device in patients aged 65 years or more with end-stage heart failure

机译:65岁或以上终末期心力衰竭患者的原位心脏移植和左心室辅助设备的结果

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Age has traditionally been a limiting factor for advanced heart failure (HF) therapies. Orthotopic heart transplantation (OHT) age guidelines have become less restrictive, and left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) are increasingly utilized as destination therapy for patients ≥65 years. Although indications differ, we assessed outcomes for both modalities in this older population. We reviewed charts of consecutive advanced HF therapy recipients aged ≥65 years at our center from 2012 to 2016. Of 118 patients evaluated, 46 (39%) received an LVAD and 72 (61%) received OHT. Gender, body mass index, and rate of prior sternotomy were similar between groups; OHT recipients were younger, less likely to have diabetes mellitus, and more likely to have HF due to ischemic etiology. Forty-six percent of patients receiving LVADs were urgent need (Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support [INTERMACS] profile 1–2), compared to 29% of patients receiving OHT (United Network for Organ Sharing 1A criteria; P = 0.068). OHT recipients had shorter lengths of stay and better 1-year survival compared to LVAD recipients. Although many centers do not offer advanced HF therapy to patients aged ≥65 years, our results indicate that age alone should not be prohibitive for advanced HF therapy, particularly OHT.
机译:传统上,年龄一直是晚期心力衰竭(HF)治疗的限制因素。原位心脏移植(OHT)年龄指南的限制已变得越来越宽松,并且左心室辅助设备(LVAD)越来越多地用于≥65岁患者的目的地治疗。尽管适应症有所不同,但我们评估了这一老年人口这两种方式的结果。我们回顾了我们中心从2012年至2016年连续≥65岁的先进HF治疗接受者的图表。在接受评估的118例患者中,有46例(39%)接受了LVAD,72例(61%)接受了OHT。两组之间的性别,体重指数和先前的胸骨切开术率相似。由于缺血的病因,OHT接受者较年轻,患糖尿病的可能性较小,而HF的可能性较高。接受LVAD的患者中有46%是紧急需要(机械辅助循环支持[INTERMACS]机构间注册表1–2),而接受OHT的患者则为29%(美国器官共享网络联合标准1A; P = 0.068)。与LVAD接受者相比,OHT接受者的住院时间更短,一年生存期更好。尽管许多中心没有为65岁以上的患者提供先进的HF治疗,但我们的研究结果表明,单独的年龄不应禁止先进的HF治疗,尤其是OHT。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号