首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Postgraduate Medical Journal >An aggressive policy of bilateral saphenous vein harvest for infragenicular revascularisation in the era of multidrug resistant bacteria
【2h】

An aggressive policy of bilateral saphenous vein harvest for infragenicular revascularisation in the era of multidrug resistant bacteria

机译:在多药耐药细菌时代双侧大隐静脉采血的积极策略可用于次叶下血运重建

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Background: The success of infragenicular revascularisation for lower limb ischaemia is limited by the high proportion of patients without ipsilateral long saphenous vein (LSV) of adequate length or quality. The aim of this study was to report the results of an autogenous vein only policy for infragenicular revascularisation utilising contralateral LSV when ipsilateral LSV is inadequate. The treatment and outcome of infection of autogenous grafts with methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is also reported. >Patients and methods: The vascular audit database and patient case notes were reviewed retrospectively for patients with arterial occlusive disease requiring infragenicular reconstruction. There were 68 critically ischaemic legs in 65 patients of whom 48 were male: median age (range) 74 years (41–94), over a three year period. >Results: Thirty six patients (53%) underwent revascularisation (eight infragenicular femoropopliteal bypass, 28 femorodistal), 24 (35%) underwent primary amputation and a further eight (12%) were found to have unsuitable distal vessels for revascularisation after tibial vessel exploration and intraoperative angiography. Thirty three grafts (92%) utilised LSV and three (8%) were polytetrafluoroethylene grafts. Thirteen patients (39%) lacked adequate ipsilateral LSV of whom 12 had the contralateral leg explored providing suitable LSV in 10/12 (83%). Contralateral LSV was used as a single length conduit in two cases and as a venovenous composite graft in eight cases. Primary, primary assisted, and secondary patency rates at two years were 38%, 77%, and 81% respectively. Actuarial limb survival and patient survival rates at two years were 86% and 61% respectively. Eleven patients developed ipsilateral wound complications (30%) including seven (21%) who developed MRSA infection of the ipsilateral leg wound. MRSA wound infection was treated successfully in all cases by antibiotic therapy (intravenous vancomycin). No patient subsequently required saphenous vein harvesting for a secondary reconstruction or coronary artery bypass graft. >Conclusion: Excellent long term results can be achieved using autogenous vein for infragenicular revascularisation and the contralateral LSV is an excellent alternative in the absence of suitable ipsilateral LSV. Autogenous vein may confer some protection against severe complications observed with MRSA infection seen in vascular patients and therefore its use is recommended.
机译:>背景:下肢缺血的次生肌血管重建术的成功受限于没有足够长度或质量的同侧长隐静脉(LSV)的患者比例很高。这项研究的目的是报告当同侧LSV不足时利用对侧LSV进行子房内血运重建的仅自体静脉策略的结果。还报道了耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)自体移植物的治疗和感染结果。 >患者和方法:回顾性审查了需要根尖下重建的动脉闭塞性疾病患者的血管审计数据库和患者病例记录。 65名患者中有68条严重缺血性腿病,其中48名是男性:三年中位年龄(范围)为74岁(41-94)。 >结果:有36例(53%)进行了血管重建术(8例膝下股pop骨搭桥术,28例股骨母线),24例(35%)进行了一次截肢,另外8例(12%)的远端不适合胫骨血管探查和术中血管造影后进行血管重建。有33个(92%)的LSV嫁接物和三个(8%)的聚四氟乙烯接枝物。 13例患者(39%)缺乏足够的同侧LSV,其中12例探查了对侧腿,在10/12中提供了合适的LSV(83%)。对侧LSV在两种情况下用作单长度导管,在八种情况下用作静脉复合移植物。两年中的主要通畅率,主要辅助通畅率和次要通畅率分别为38%,77%和81%。两年的精算肢体存活率和患者存活率分别为86%和61%。 11名患者发生了同侧伤口并发症(30%),其中7名(21%)发生了同侧腿部伤口的MRSA感染。在所有情况下,通过抗生素治疗(万古霉素静脉注射)均可成功治疗MRSA伤口感染。随后,没有患者需要进行大隐静脉收获以进行二次重建或冠状动脉搭桥术。 >结论:使用自体静脉进行股骨下血运重建可取得出色的长期效果,而对侧LSV在缺乏合适的同侧LSV的情况下是一种极好的选择。自体静脉可以提供一些保护,以防止在血管患者中观察到的MRSA感染所引起的严重并发症,因此建议使用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号