【2h】

Adaptable individuals and innovative lineages

机译:适应能力强的个人和创新血统

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This paper suggests (i) that while work on animal innovation has made good progress in understanding some of the proximate mechanisms and selective regimes through which innovation emerges, it has somewhat neglected the role of the social environment of innovation; a neglect manifest in the fact that innovation counts are almost always counts of resource-acquisition innovations; the invention of social tools is rarely considered. The same is true of many experimental projects, as these typically impose food acquisition tasks on their experimental subjects. (ii) That neglect is important, because innovations often pose collective action problems; the hominin species were technically innovative because they were also socially adaptable. (iii) In part for this reason, there remains a disconnect between research on hominin innovation and research on animal innovation. (iv) Finally, the paper suggests that there is something of a disconnect between the theoretical work on innovation in hominin evolution (based on theories of cultural evolution) and the experimental tradition on human innovation. That disconnect is largely due to the theoretical work retreating from strong claims about the proximate mechanisms of human cultural accumulation.
机译:本文认为:(i)尽管在动物创新方面的工作在理解创新产生的一些近端机制和选择性机制方面取得了良好的进展,但在某种程度上却忽略了创新社会环境的作用;被忽视的事实是,创新数量几乎总是资源获取创新的数量;很少考虑社交工具的发明。许多实验项目也是如此,因为这些项目通常会将食物采集任务强加给他们的实验对象。 ii忽视这一点很重要,因为创新经常带来集体行动问题;人种的技术创新,因为它们也具有社会适应性。 (iii)部分由于这个原因,在人参素创新研究与动物创新研究之间仍然存在脱节。 (iv)最后,本文提出,在人类素进化方面的创新理论工作(基于文化进化理论)与人类创新的实验传统之间存在某种脱节。这种脱节在很大程度上是由于理论工作撤退了对人类文化积累的近代机制的强烈要求。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号