【2h】

Should assisted dying be legalised?

机译:辅助死亡是否应合法化?

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

When an individual facing intractable pain is given an estimate of a few months to live, does hastening death become a viable and legitimate alternative for willing patients? Has the time come for physicians to do away with the traditional notion of healthcare as maintaining or improving physical and mental health, and instead accept their own limitations by facilitating death when requested? The Universities of Oxford and Cambridge held the 2013 Varsity Medical Debate on the motion “This House Would Legalise Assisted Dying”. This article summarises the key arguments developed over the course of the debate. We will explore how assisted dying can affect both the patient and doctor; the nature of consent and limits of autonomy; the effects on society; the viability of a proposed model; and, perhaps most importantly, the potential need for the practice within our current medico-legal framework.
机译:如果给一个面临顽固性疼痛的人估计可以活几个月,那么加快死亡是否会成为有意愿患者的可行和合法的选择?医师现在是否该摆脱传统的医疗保健观念,即维持或改善身体和精神健康,而是在需要时通过促进死亡来接受自己的局限性?牛津大学和剑桥大学就“这所院将使辅助染化合法化”议案举行了2013年大学运动医学辩论。本文总结了辩论过程中形成的关键论点。我们将探讨辅助死亡如何影响患者和医生。同意的性质和自治的范围;对社会的影响;拟议模型的可行性;也许是最重要的是,在我们目前的法医学框架内对这种做法的潜在需求。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号