...
首页> 外文期刊>Trends in Urology and Men's Health >Should patient assisted dying be legalised?
【24h】

Should patient assisted dying be legalised?

机译:患者是否应该合法化?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This February the Royal College of Physicians surveyed its 35 000 members to enquire whether they wished to change their opposition to assisted dying to a neutral stance. Five years ago, 44% of members voted against and only 25% in favour of assisted dying (the rest were neutral). The result of this survey will be available in March this year. Assisted dying is currently prohibited under the Suicide Act of 1961. Members of Parliament decisively rejected a bill in 2015 that would have allowed terminally ill patients with fewer than six months to live to be provided with assistance, provided that there were certain legal safeguards, to proceed to assisted suicide. However, recent polling evidence suggests that more than three quarters of the public are now in favour of assisted dying. The House of Lords ruled in 2009 that the Director of Public Prosecutions should specify exactly when a person might be prosecuted for assisting someone to end their own life. Their concern was to differentiate between compassionate assistance and malicious pressure, possibly for fiduciary gain. Despite the fact that the then Director of Public Prosecutions established a committee to establish guidelines for dealing with these tragic circumstances, the situation still remains unclear.
机译:今年2月,皇家医生调查了35 000名成员来询问他们是否希望改变反对反对的反对,以协助死亡。五年前,44%的成员投票反对,只有25%的人支持辅助死亡(其余的是中性的)。本调查的结果将于今年3月提供。目前在1961年的自杀法案下禁止了辅助死亡。议会成员在2015年审判了一项法案,将允许患有少于六个月的患者,以便在援助提供援助,规定有一定的法律保障,继续辅助自杀。然而,最近的投票证据表明,现在超过四分之三的公众现在有利于辅助死亡。主席于2009年统治,何时应当何时可以获得一个人来协助某人结束自己的生命来指定一切。他们的担忧是区分富有富有援助和恶意的压力,可能是为了信托收益。尽管当时的公共检察主任设立了一个委员会,以建立处理这些悲惨环境的准则,但情况仍然尚不清楚。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号