首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>The Permanente Journal >Evidence-Based Medicine and Bioethics: Implications for Health Care Organizations Clinicians and Patients
【2h】

Evidence-Based Medicine and Bioethics: Implications for Health Care Organizations Clinicians and Patients

机译:循证医学与生物伦理学:对卫生保健组织临床医生和患者的影响

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Since its beginning in the 1990s, enthusiasm for evidence-based medicine (EBM) has flourished. As its methodology becomes more sophisticated and its breadth expands, EBM increasingly is referred to in patient care, insurance coverage decisions, technology assessments, medical education, and health care policymaking. Despite this growth, the intersection of EBM and bioethics often is not explored.This article discusses the deontologic and utilitarian aspects of EBM and assesses EBM according to 4 bioethical principles: Respect for autonomy, beneficence, nonmaleficence, and justice. Strong ethical arguments support EBM as the best approach to patient care. However, practitioners and health care organizations must be aware that each principle involves complex issues that challenge EBM’s ethical values.
机译:自1990年代开始以来,对循证医学(EBM)的热情就蓬勃发展。随着其方法学变得越来越复杂和范围越来越广,EBM在患者护理,保险范围决策,技术评估,医学教育和医疗保健政策制定中越来越多地被提及。尽管有这种增长,但EBM和生物伦理学的交集却常常不被探讨。本文讨论了EBM的道义论和功利主义方面,并根据以下4个生物伦理学原理对EBM进行了评估:尊重自治,善意,非恶意和正义。有力的道德论据支持将EBM作为患者护理的最佳方法。但是,从业者和医疗保健组织必须意识到,每项原则都涉及复杂的问题,这些挑战挑战了EBM的道德价值观。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号