首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Perioperative Medicine >Perioperative fluid management: moving toward more answers than questions—a commentary on the RELIEF study
【2h】

Perioperative fluid management: moving toward more answers than questions—a commentary on the RELIEF study

机译:围手术期液体管理:寻求更多的答案而不是问题—对RELIEF研究的评论

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Perioperative fluid and hemodynamic management have been much-debated topics over the last few years. Recently, a number of large trials have been published to help inform this debate. The Restrictive versus Liberal Fluid Therapy for Major Abdominal Surgery (RELIEF) study is the largest trial to date of perioperative fluid management. The 3000-patient trial comparing 2 different fluid regimes showed that a restrictive fluid regimen during and up to 24 h after surgery was associated with an increase in acute kidney injury (AKI). This result is at odds with a recent trend to a more restrictive fluid approach during major surgery and suggests that practice may have become too restrictive. A moderately liberal (aiming for 1–2 l positive) or goal-directed approach is therefore recommended.
机译:在过去的几年中,围手术期液体和血液动力学管理一直是备受争议的话题。最近,已经发布了许多大型试验来帮助推动这场辩论。腹部大手术的限制性与非限制性液体疗法(RELIEF)研究是迄今为止围手术期液体管理的最大试验。这项由3000名患者组成的试验对2种不同的输液方案进行了比较,结果表明,在手术期间和术后24小时内,限制性输液方案与急性肾损伤(AKI)的增加有关。这一结果与最近在大手术中使用限制性更严格的输液方法的趋势相矛盾,并且表明实践可能变得过于严格。因此,建议采取适度宽松的态度​​(针对1-2 l的积极态度)或目标导向的方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号