首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Open Medicine >Have last-observation-carried-forward analyses caused us to favour more toxic dementia therapies over less toxic alternatives? A systematic review
【2h】

Have last-observation-carried-forward analyses caused us to favour more toxic dementia therapies over less toxic alternatives? A systematic review

机译:最后观察进行的分析是否使我们偏爱毒性更强的痴呆疗法而不是毒性更小的替代品?系统评价

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

BackgroundIntention-to-treat analysis is used in the analysis of randomized controlled trials to preserve trial power in the presence of missing subject data as well as to control for both known and unknown confounding factors. One form of intention-to-treat analysis is last-observation-carried-forward (LOCF). Concerns exist regarding whether it is appropriate to use LOCF in analyses involving progressive conditions or in situations where missing data are non-random (e.g., subjects drop out because of treatment side effects or differing disease severity).
机译:背景意向治疗分析用于随机对照试验的分析,以在缺少受试者数据的情况下保留试验能力,并控制已知和未知的混杂因素。意向性处理分析的一种形式是最后观察进行转发(LOCF)。在涉及渐进条件或缺少随机数据的情况下(例如,由于治疗副作用或疾病严重程度不同而导致受试者辍学)的情况下,存在使用LOCF是否合适的担忧。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号