首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Oncotarget >Efficacy of intermittent pneumatic compression for venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in patients undergoing gynecologic surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis
【2h】

Efficacy of intermittent pneumatic compression for venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in patients undergoing gynecologic surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis

机译:间歇性气压治疗对妇科手术患者静脉血栓栓塞的预防作用:系统评价和荟萃分析

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

We sought to comprehensively assess the efficacy of Intermittent Pneumatic Compression (IPC) in patients undergoing gynecologic surgery. A computerized literature search was conducted in Pubmed, Embase and Cochrane Library databases. Seven randomized controlled trials involving 1001 participants were included. Compared with control, IPC significantly lowered the deep vein thrombosis (DVT) risk [risk ratio (RR) = 0.33, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.16 – 0.66]. The incidence of DVT in IPC and drugs group was similar (4.5% versus. 3.99%, RR = 1.19, 95% CI: 0.42 – 3.44). With regards to pulmonary embolism risk, no significant difference was observed in IPC versus control or IPC versus drugs. IPC had a lower postoperative transfusion rate than heparin (RR = 0.53, 95% CI: 0.32 – 0.89), but had a similar transfusion rate in operating room to low molecular weight heparin (RR = 1.06, 95% CI: 0.69 – 1.63). Combined use of IPC and graduated compression stockings (GCS) had a marginally lower risk of DVT than GCS alone (RR = 0.38, 95% CI: 0.14 – 1.03). In summary, IPC is effective in reducing DVT complications in gynecologic surgery. IPC is neither superior nor inferior to pharmacological thromboprophylaxis. However, whether combination of IPC and chemoprophylaxis is more effective than IPC or chemoprophylaxis alone remains unknown in this patient population.
机译:我们试图全面评估间歇性气压治疗(IPC)在接受妇科手术的患者中的疗效。在Pubmed,Embase和Cochrane图书馆数据库中进行了计算机文献检索。包括七项涉及1001名参与者的随机对照试验。与对照组相比,IPC显着降低了深静脉血​​栓形成(DVT)的风险[风险比(RR)= 0.33,95%置信区间(CI):0.16 – 0.66]。 IPC和药物组中DVT的发生率相似(4.5%比3.99%,RR = 1.19,95%CI:0.42-3.44)。关于肺栓塞风险,在IPC与对照组或IPC与药物之间未观察到显着差异。 IPC的术后输血率低于肝素(RR = 0.53,95%CI:0.32 – 0.89),但手术室的输血率与低分子量肝素相似(RR = 1.06,95%CI:0.69 – 1.63) 。与单独使用GCS组合使用IPC和渐进式压缩长袜(GCS)产生DVT的风险略低(RR = 0.38,95%CI:0.14 – 1.03)。总之,IPC可有效减少妇科手术中的DVT并发症。 IPC既不优于也不低于药理学上的血栓预防。但是,在该患者人群中,IPC和化学预防的组合是否比IPC或单独的化学预防更有效仍然未知。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号